Review of electrofuel feasibility—prospects for road, ocean, and air transport
Open accessAbstract
To meet climate targets the emissions of greenhouse gases from transport need to be reduced considerably. Electrofuels (e-fuels) produced from low-CO 2 electricity, water, and carbon (or nitrogen) are potential low-climate-impact transportation fuels. The purpose of this review is to provide a technoeconomic assessment of the feasibility and potential of e-fuels for road, ocean, and air transport. The assessment is based on a review of publications discussing e-fuels for one or more transport modes. For each transport mode, (a) e-fuel options are mapped, (b) cost per transport unit (e.g. vehicle km) and carbon abatement costs are estimated and compared to conventional options, (c) prospects and challenges are highlighted, and (d) policy context is described. Carbon abatement costs for e-fuels (considering vehicle cost, fuel production and distribution cost) are estimated to be in the range 110–1250 € tonne−1 CO 2 with e-gasoline and e-diesel at the high end of the range. The investigated combined biofuel and e-fuels production pathways (based on forest residues and waste) are more cost-competitive than the stand-alone e-fuel production pathways, but the global availability of sustainable biomass is limited making these pathways more constrained. While the potential for e-fuels to decarbonize the transport sector has been discussed extensively in the literature, many uncertainties in terms of production costs, vehicle costs and environmental performance remain. It is too early to rule out or strongly promote particular e-fuels for different transport modes. For e-fuels to play a significant role in transportation, their attractiveness relative to other transport options needs to be improved. Incentives will be needed for e-fuels to be cost-effective and increased clarity on how e-fuels are linked to existing policies is needed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs
Brynolf, S., Taljegard, M., Grahn, M., & Hansson, J. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.288 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Self-citationAviation CO2 emissions reductions from the use of alternative jet fuels
Staples, M. D., Malina, R., Suresh, P., Hileman, J. I., & Barrett, S. R. H. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.007 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Pérez-Fortes, M., Schöneberger, J. C., Boulamanti, A., Harrison, G., & Tzimas, E. (2016) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.199 · Cited by 301 · cited 1× · see citing works
“McDonagh et al [94] A (LS) x McDonagh et al [95] A (LS) x McKenna et al [96] A (LS) x x Saccullo et al [97] A (LS) x Monaco et al [98] A (SB) x x Mortensen [99] R (SB) x Müller et al [100] A (LS) x Müller-Langer et al [101] A (LS) x Panzone et al [102] A (LS) x x x Pérez-Fortes et al [103] A (SB) x Plötz et al [104] R…”
Khalili, S., Rantanen, E., Bogdanov, D., & Breyer, C. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12203870 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Slade, R., Bauen, A., & Gross, R. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2097 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Life Cycle Assessment of Power-to-Gas: Syngas vs Methane
Sternberg, A., & Bardow, A. (2016) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00644 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arias, A., Nika, C.-E., Vasilaki, V., Feijoo, G., Moreira, M. T., & Katsou, E. (2024) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114427 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
D'Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., Giannini, M., & Nizami, A.-S. (2024) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2024.118163 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Estevez, R., López-Tenllado, F. J., Aguado-Deblas, L., Bautista, F. M., Romero, A. A., & Luna, D. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16145451 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brynolf, S., Hansson, J., Anderson, J. E., Skov, I. R., Wallington, T. J., Grahn, M., Korberg, A. D., Malmgren, E., & Taljegård, M.
- Affiliations
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (SE)
- Ford Motor Company (United States) (US)
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Brynolf, Selma
- ORCID
- Venue
- Progress in Energy
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2022-08-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 042007
- ISSN
- 2516-1083 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4285091773
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Progress in Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nordic Energy Research (HOPE (Hydrogen fuel cells solutions in shipping in)
- Swedish Knowledge Centre for Renewable Transportation Fuels (P48357-1)
- Innovation Fund Denmark (RE-INVEST “Renewable Energy Investment Strategie)
- Trafikverket (HOPE (Hydrogen fuel cells solutions in shipping in)
- Energiforsk (Vätgasens roll i energi och klimatomställningen)
- Mistra - the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra Carbon Exit Phase 2)
- Swedish Energy Agency
- Energy Technology Development and Demonstration Programme (64017-0011)
- Ford’s University Research Program
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
- Keywords
- electrofuels, e-fuels, transport decarbonization, carbon abatement costs, road transport, maritime transport, aviation, biofuels, forest residues, biomass waste, techno-economic analysis, transportation greenhouse gas emissions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review