The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automated Quantitative Gait Analysis During Overground Locomotion in the Rat: Its Application to Spinal Cord Contusion and Transection Injuries
Abstract
Analysis of locomotion is an important tool in the study of peripheral and central nervous system damage. Most locomotor scoring systems in rodents are based either upon open field locomotion assessment, for example, the BBB score or upon foot print analysis. The former yields a semiquantitative description of locomotion as a whole, whereas the latter generates quantitative data on several selected gait parameters. In this paper, we describe the use of a newly developed gait analysis method that allows easy quantitation of a large number of locomotion parameters during walkway crossing. We were able to extract data on interlimb coordination, swing duration, paw print areas (total over stance, and at 20-msec time resolution), stride length, and base of support: Similar data can not be gathered by any single previously described method. We compare changes in gait parameters induced by two different models of spinal cord injury in rats, transection of the dorsal half of the spinal cord and spinal cord contusion injury induced by the NYU or MASCIS device. Although we applied this method to rats with spinal cord injury, the usefulness of this method is not limited to rats or to the investigation of spinal cord injuries alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neuronal activity promotes oligodendrogenesis and adaptive myelination in the mammalian brain
Gibson, E. M., Purger, D., Mount, C. W., Goldstein, A. K., Lin, G. L., Wood, L. S., Inema, I., Miller, S. E., Bieri, G., Zuchero, J. B., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1252304 · Cited by 1,472
Subchondral bone osteoclasts induce sensory innervation and osteoarthritis pain
Zhu, S., Zhu, J., Zhen, G., Hu, Y., An, S., Li, Y., Zheng, Q., Chen, Z., Yang, Y., Wan, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci121561 · Cited by 456
Nogo‐A antibody improves regeneration and locomotion of spinal cord–injured rats
Liebscher, T., Schnell, L., Schnell, D., Scholl, J., Schneider, R., Gullo, M., Fouad, K., Mir, A., Rausch, M., Kindler, D., et al. (2005) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20627 · Cited by 351
Self-citationSmidt, M. P., Smits, S. M., Bouwmeester, H., Hamers, F. P. T., van der Linden, A. J. A., Hellemons, A. J. C. G. M., Graw, J., & Burbach, J. P. H. (2004) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01022 · Cited by 317
Self-citationThe neuromuscular junction is a focal point of mTORC1 signaling in sarcopenia
Ham, D. J., Börsch, A., Lin, S., Thürkauf, M., Weihrauch, M., Reinhard, J. R., Delezie, J., Battilana, F., Wang, X., Kaiser, M. S., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18140-1 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamers, F. P. T., Lankhorst, A. J., van Laar, T. J., Veldhuis, W. B., & Gispen, W. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-201
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W1990840758
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated Quantitative Gait Analysis During Overground Locomotion in the Rat: Its Application to Spinal Cord Contusion and Transection Injuries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/08977150150502613
- The paper
- Hamers, F. P. T., Lankhorst, A. J., van Laar, T. J., Veldhuis, W. B., & Gispen, W. H. (2001). Automated Quantitative Gait Analysis During Overground Locomotion in the Rat: Its Application to Spinal Cord Contusion and Transection Injuries. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/08977150150502613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.