Cited by 33Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchS100 Proteins and Annexins

Cerebrospinal fluid apolipoprotein E concentration decreases after traumatic brain injury

Kay, Andrew D., Petzold, Axel, Kerr, Mary, Keir, Geoff, Thompson, Ed J., Nicoll, James A.R.·2003·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

The APOE epsilon4 allele has been associated with unfavorable outcome after several types of acute brain injury, yet the biological mechanisms underlying this observation are poorly understood. Postmortem and experimental brain injury studies suggest the presence of increased amounts of apolipoprotein E (apoE) within the neuropil after acute brain injury. We assayed the concentration of apolipoprotein E in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of non-injured controls and patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) to determine whether differences exist, and if these differences correlate with injury severity and clinical outcome. CSF apoE and S100B, a marker of injury severity, were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbant assay. CSF was sampled from 27 traumatic brain injury patients (mean age 32, median 25, range 16-65 years) within 3 days of injury, and 28 controls (mean age 40, median 37, range 19-73 years). The TBI patients all had a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of less than eight (i.e., severe head injury). Clinical outcome was determined using the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). The average concentration of apoE in the CSF of controls was 12.4 mg/L (95% CI: 10.5-14.3 mg/L) and in TBI patients was 3.7 mg/L (95% CI: 2.1-4.1 mg/L; Mann-Whitney: p < 0.0001). In contrast, the concentration of S100B in the CSF of TBI patients was significantly higher than that of controls (Mann-Whitney: p < 0.0001). We speculate that apoE is retained within the parenchyma of the central nervous system in res…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/089771503321532824

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kay, A. D., Petzold, A., Kerr, M., Keir, G., Thompson, E. J., & Nicoll, J. A. R.
Affiliations
  • Southern General Hospital (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Southampton General Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2003-03
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
243-250
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W1527305439
Cited by
33
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › S100 Proteins and Annexins
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, cerebrospinal fluid, traumatic brain injury, APOE ε4, S100B, injury severity, clinical outcomes, neuroprotection, biomarkers, severe traumatic brain injury
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Albumins, Apolipoproteins E, Brain Injuries, Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Growth Factors, S100 Proteins, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Glasgow Coma Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale, S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review