Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Glutamatergic Changes with Treatment in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Preliminary Case Series

Carrey, Normand, MacMaster, Frank P., Sparkes, Sandra J., Khan, Shakeela C., Kusumakar, Vivek·2002·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, a noninvasive neuroimaging method, is a technique with the potential to measure in vivo neurochemical changes to different medication treatments. Symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) improved in two children treated with methylphenidate and two children treated with atomoxetine, for whom pre- and posttreatment proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy examinations were obtained to assess the relation between the neurochemical profiles in the striatum and prefrontal cortex among symptom severity and response to treatment. In the striatum, a striking decrease in the glutamate/creatine ratio (mean change 56.1%) was observed between 14 and 18 weeks of therapy in all four children with ADHD. In the prefrontal cortex, however, changes in the glutamate/creatine ratio were noted only in subjects receiving atomoxetine, not in those receiving methylphenidate. These data suggest that in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurement has the potential to assess response to psychopharmacological treatment in children with ADHD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/104454602762599871

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01321-X · DOI
  2. 10.1542/peds.108.5.e83 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1097/00004583-199603000-00006 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0006-3223(97)00443-5 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1097/00004583-200009000-00008 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.1.11 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00175-7 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Taber MT, 1995, J Neurosci, 15, 3896, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-03896.1995 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199803)28:3<220::AID-SYN5>3.3.CO;2-C · DOI
  10. Vitiello B, 2001, CMAJ, 165, 1505

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carrey, N., MacMaster, F. P., Sparkes, S. J., Khan, S. C., & Kusumakar, V.
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2002-12
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
331-336
ISSN
  • 1044-5463
  • 1557-8992
Cited by
49
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review