The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Polymer Foam Conduit Seeded with Schwann Cells Promotes Guided Peripheral Nerve Regeneration
Abstract
Alternatives to autografts have long been sought for use in bridging neural gaps. Many entubulation materials have been studied, although with generally disappointing results in comparison with autografts. The purpose of this study was to design a more effective neural guidance conduit, to introduce Schwann cells into the conduit, and to determine regenerative capability through it in an in vivo model. A novel, fully biodegradable polymer conduit was designed and fabricated for use in peripheral nerve repair, which approximates the macro- and microarchitecture of native peripheral nerves. It comprised a series of longitudinally aligned channels, with diameters ranging from 60 to 550 microns. The lumenal surfaces promoted the adherence of Schwann cells, whose presence is known to play a key role in nerve regeneration. This unique channel architecture increased the surface area available for Schwann cell adherence up to five-fold over that available through a simple hollow conduit. The conduit was composed of a high-molecular-weight copolymer of lactic and glycolic acids (PLGA) (MW 130,000) in an 85:15 monomer ratio. A novel foam-processing technique, employing low-pressure injection molding, was used to create highly porous conduits (approximately 90% pore volume) with continuous longitudinal channels. Using this technique, conduits were constructed containing 1, 5, 16, 45, or more longitudinally aligned channels. Prior to cellular seeding of these conduits, the foams were prewet with 50% ethanol, flushed with physiologic saline, and coated with laminin solution (10 microg/mL). A Schwann cell suspension was dynamically introduced into these processed foams at a concentration of 5 X 10(5) cells/mL, using a simple bioreactor flow loop. In vivo regeneration studies were carried out in which cell-laden five-channel polymer conduits (individual channel ID 500 microm, total conduit OD 2.3 mm) were implanted across a 7-mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve (n = 4), and midgraft axonal regeneration compared with autografts (n = 6). At 6 weeks, axonal regeneration was observed in the midconduit region of all five channels in each experimental animal. The cross-sectional area comprising axons relative to the open conduit cross sectional area (mean 26.3%, SD 10. 1%) compared favorably with autografts (mean 23.8%, SD 3.6%). Our methodology can be used to create polymer foam conduits containing longitudinally aligned channels, to introduce Schwann cells into them, and to implant them into surgically created neural defects. These conduits provide an environment permissive to axonal regeneration. Furthermore, this polymer foam-processing method and unique channeled architecture allows the introduction of neurotrophic factors into the conduit in a controlled fashion. Deposition of different factors into distinct regions within the conduit may be possible to promote more precisely guided neural regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., Baharvand, H., Kiani, S., Al-Deyab, S. S., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.383 · Cited by 698
Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration
Gu, X., Ding, F., & Williams, D. F. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.064 · Cited by 630
Synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS): A review
Rai, R., Tallawi, M., Grigore, A., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.02.001 · Cited by 477
Biocompatibility analysis of poly(glycerol sebacate) as a nerve guide material
Sundback, C. A., Shyu, J. Y., Wang, Y., Faquin, W. C., Langer, R. S., Vacanti, J. P., & Hadlock, T. A. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.004 · Cited by 443
Self-citation3D printed anatomical nerve regeneration pathways
Johnson, B. N., Lancaster, K. Z., Zhen, G., He, J., Gupta, M. K., Kong, Y. L., Engel, E. A., Krick, K. D., Ju, A., Meng, F., et al. (2015) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201501760 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Hadlock, T., Sundback, C., Hunter, D., Cheney, M., & Vacanti, J. P.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-127
- ISSN
- 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8690
- OpenAlex
- W2024643463
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Polymer Foam Conduit Seeded with Schwann Cells Promotes Guided Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/107632700320748
- The paper
- Hadlock, T., Sundback, C., Hunter, D., Cheney, M., & Vacanti, J. P. (2000). A Polymer Foam Conduit Seeded with Schwann Cells Promotes Guided Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Tissue Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1089/107632700320748
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.