The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Salt Fusion: An Approach to Improve Pore Interconnectivity within Tissue Engineering Scaffolds
Open accessAbstract
Macroporous scaffolds composed of biodegradable polymers have found extensive use as three-dimensional substrates either for in vitro cell seeding followed by transplantation, or as conductive substrates for direct implantation in vivo. Methods abound for creation of macroporous scaffolds for tissue engineering, and common methods typically employ a solid porogen within a three-dimensional polymer matrix to create a well-defined pore size, pore structure, and total scaffold porosity. This study describes an approach to impart improved pore interconnectivity to polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering by partially fusing the solid porogen together prior to creation of a continuous polymer matrix. Three dimensional, porous scaffolds of the copolymer 85:15 poly(lactide-co-glycolide) were fabricated via either a solvent casting/particulate leaching process, or a gas foaming/particulate leaching process. Prior to creation of a continuous polymer matrix the NaCl crystals, which serve as the solid porogen, are partially fused via treatment in 95% humidity. Scanning electron micrographs clearly display fused salt crystals and an enhancement in pore interconnectivity in the salt fused scaffolds prepared via both solvent casting and gas foaming, and the extent of pore interconnectivity is enhanced with longer treatment times. Fusion of salt crystal for 24 h increased the radius of curvature of salt crystals, and led to a twofold increase in the compressive modulus of solvent cast scaffolds (total porosity of 97 +/- 1%). Fusion of NaCl crystals prior to gas foaming resulted in a decrease in scaffold compressive modulus from 277 +/- 60k Pa to 187 +/- 30k Pa (total porosity of 94 +/- 1%). The resulting highly interconnected scaffolds have implications for facilitated cell migration, abundant cell-cell interaction, and potentially improved neural and vascular growth within tissue engineering scaffolds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polymeric Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Application: A Review
Dhandayuthapani, B., Yoshida, Y., Maekawa, T., & Kumar, D. S. (2011) · International Journal of Polymer Science · doi:10.1155/2011/290602 · Cited by 1,773
Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Matrices: State of the Art
Lee, J., Cuddihy, M. J., & Kotov, N. A. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/teb.2007.0150 · Cited by 1,047
Collagen for bone tissue regeneration
Ferreira, A. M., Gentile, P., Chiono, V., & Ciardelli, G. (2012) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.014 · Cited by 938
A Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Sponge for the Selective Absorption of Oil from Water
Choi, S.-J., Kwon, T.-H., Im, H., Moon, D.-I., Baek, D. J., Seol, M.-L., Duarte, J. P., & Choi, Y.-K. (2011) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am201352w · Cited by 707
Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds with Well-Defined Interconnected Spherical Pore Network
Ma, P. X., & Choi, J.-W. (2001) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/107632701300003269 · Cited by 620
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, W. L., Dennis, R. G., Kileny, J. L., & Mooney, D. J.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-52
- ISSN
- 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8690
- OpenAlex
- W2073335558
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Salt Fusion: An Approach to Improve Pore Interconnectivity within Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/107632702753503045
- The paper
- Murphy, W. L., Dennis, R. G., Kileny, J. L., & Mooney, D. J. (2002). Salt Fusion: An Approach to Improve Pore Interconnectivity within Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Tissue Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1089/107632702753503045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.