The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Technique and 3-Year Follow-Up
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate our experience with the laparoscopic gastric bypass. The technique, weight loss data, and complications are described. METHODS: 1,500 consecutive patients were evaluated prospectively. All patients met NIH criteria for bariatric surgery. Although there have been modifications with respect to staplers, suture material, and dissection techniques, the basic anatomical construct has remained the same, including performing a completely hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy. RESULTS: There were no anastomotic leaks from the hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy. Operative times now are consistently 60 minutes or less, although the learning curve is quite long. Average hospital stay was 1.5 days. Average excessive weight loss was 69% at one and two years and 62% at three years. Overall complication rate was 14.8%. Perioperative death rate was 0.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic gastric bypass is a viable alternative to traditional open techniques. It is as safe and effective and can be performed with equal or greater efficiency. Adoption of hand-suturing techniques helps to improve the surgeon's skill and ability to cope with the occasional stapler misfire or complication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity
Panel, C. D. C. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-12-956 · Cited by 2,163
(1992) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/55.2.615s · Cited by 748
Cited by
Salminen, P., Helmiö, M., Ovaska, J., Juuti, A., Leivonen, M., Peromaa-Haavisto, P., Hurme, S., Soinio, M., Nuutila, P., & Victorzon, M. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.20313 · Cited by 946
Gut hormones as mediators of appetite and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
le Roux, C. W., Welbourn, R., Werling, M., Osborne, A., Kokkinos, A., Laurenius, A., Lönroth, H., Fändriks, L., Ghatei, M. A., Bloom, S. R., et al. (2007) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3180caa3e3 · Cited by 741
The Science of Stapling and Leaks
Baker, R. S., Foote, J., Kemmeter, P., Brady, R., Vroegop, T., & Serveld, M. (2004) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/0960892042583888 · Cited by 441
Olbers, T., Bj??rkman, S., Lindroos, A., Maleckas, A., L??nn, L., Sj??str??m, L., & L??nroth, H. (2006) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000218085.25902.f8 · Cited by 340
Complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Lalor, P. F., Tucker, O. N., Szomstein, S., & Rosenthal, R. J. (2008) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2007.08.015 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Higa, K. D., Ho, T., & Boone, K. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 377-382
- ISSN
- 1092-6429 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9034
- OpenAlex
- W1982332483
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Technique and 3-Year Follow-Up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/10926420152761905
- The paper
- Higa, K. D., Ho, T., & Boone, K. B. (2001). Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Technique and 3-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. https://doi.org/10.1089/10926420152761905
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.