Cited by 340Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBody Contouring and SurgeryMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Body Composition, Dietary Intake, and Energy Expenditure After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Olbers, Torsten, Bj??rkman, Sofia, Lindroos, Ak, Maleckas, Almantas, L??nn, Lars, Sj??str??m, Lars, L??nroth, Hans·2006·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To assess body composition, eating pattern, and basal metabolic rate in patients undergoing obesity surgery in a randomized trial. Introduction: There is limited knowledge regarding how different bariatric surgical techniques function in terms of altering body composition, dietary intake, and basic metabolic rate. Methods: Non-superobese patients were randomized to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LGBP, n = 37) or laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (LVBG, n = 46). Anthropometry, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), computed tomography (CT), indirect calorimetry, and reported dietary intake were registered prior to and 1 year after surgery. Results: Follow-up rate was 97.6%. LGBP patients had significantly greater reduction of waist circumference and sagittal diameter compared with LVBG. DEXA demonstrated a larger reduction of body fat in all compartments after LGBP, especially at the trunk (P<0.001). CT demonstrated more reduction of the visceral fat (P=0.016). Patients were able to eat all types of food after LGBP, although about 30% claimed they avoided fats. LGBP patients decreased their proportion of dietary fat significantly more than those operated on with LVBG (P = 0.005), who consumed more sweet foods and avoided whole meat and vegetables. Lean tissue mass (LTM) was proportionally less reduced, especially in men, after LGBP. The decreases in BMR postoperatively reflected the lower body mass in a pattern that did not differ among the groups. Conclusion: LGBP patients demonstrated better outcomes compared with LVBG patients in terms of body composition. Energy expenditure developed as expected postoperatively. A “steering” away from fatty foods after LGBP may be an important mechanism of action in gastric bypass. Non-superobese patients were operated with laparoscopic gastric bypass or laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty in a randomized clinical trial. The outcome 1 year after surgery concerning anthropometry favored gastric bypass with a body composition reflecting a lower metabolic risk. No differences were found concerning the development of basic metabolic rate, while there were large differences in eating patterns where patients after gastric bypass “normalized” their diet and reduced their intake of calories, especially from fat foods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000218085.25902.f8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RYGB subjects typically lose more weight and more bone at the hip and femoral neck at one year than those who undergo gastric banding or vertical banded gastroplasty.

    “Typically, RYGB subjects lose more weight and more bone at the hip and FN at one year than those who undergo GB44, 52 or VBG.72.”
  • Endorsements of favorite foods were mostly sweet/fatty foods in subjects awaiting surgery but shifted toward more healthy choices, particularly vegetables, in subjects post-RYGB.

    “endorsements of “favorite” foods were mostly sweet/fatty foods in subjects awaiting surgery but were shifted toward more healthy choices, particularly vegetables, in subjects post-RYGB surgery.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:1-253.
  2. Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, et al. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1097-1105.
  3. The SBU on overweight and obesity: huge increase of overweight- related diseases. Lakartidningen. 2002;99:3188 -3192.
  4. Sjostrom CD, Lissner L, Wedel H, et al. Reduction in incidence of diabetes, hypertension and lipid disturbances after intentional weight loss induced by bariatric surgery: the SOS Intervention Study. Obes Res. 1999;7:477-484.
  5. Karlsson J, Sjostrom L, Sullivan M. Swedish obese subjects (SOS): an intervention study of obesity. Two-year follow-up of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and eating behavior after gastric surgery for severe obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22:113-126.
  6. Brolin RL, Robertson LB, Kenler HA, et al. Weight loss and dietary intake after vertical banded gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 1994;220:782-790.
  7. Hall JC, Watts JM, O'Brien PE, et al. Gastric surgery for morbid obesity: the Adelaide Study. Ann Surg. 1990;211:419 -427.
  8. Howard L, Malone M, Michalek A, et al. Gastric bypass and vertical banded gastroplasty: a prospective randomized comparison and 5-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 1995;5:55-60.
  9. MacLean LD, Rhode BM, Forse RA, et al. Surgery for obesity: an update of a randomized trial. Obes Surg. 1995;5:145-150.
  10. Naslund I. Gastric bypass versus gastroplasty: a prospective study of differences in two surgical procedures for morbid obesity. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1987;536:1-60.
  11. Gahtan V, Goode SE, Kurto HZ, et al. Body composition and source of weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 1997;7:184 -8.
  12. Adami GF, Barreca A, Gianetta E, et al. Body composition in subjects with surgically obtained stable body weight normalization. Int J Obes. 1989;13:55-58.
  13. Giusti V, Suter M, Heraief E, et al. Effects of laparoscopic gastric banding on body composition, metabolic profile and nutritional status of obese women: 12-months follow-up. Obes Surg. 2004;14:239 -245.
  14. Flancbaum L, Choban PS, Bradley LR, et al. Changes in measured resting energy expenditure after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for clinically severe obesity. Surgery. 1997;122:943-949.
  15. Das SK, Roberts SB, McCrory MA, et al. Long-term changes in energy expenditure and body composition after massive weight loss induced by gastric bypass surgery. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:22-30.
  16. Feurer ID, Crosby LO, Buzby GP, et al. Resting energy expenditure in morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 1983;197:17-21.
  17. Buscemi S, Caimi G, Verga S. Resting metabolic rate and postabsorptive substrate oxidation in morbidly obese subjects before and after massive weight loss. Int J Obes. 1996;20:41-46.
  18. Olbers T, Fagevik Olsen MF, et al. Randomized clinical trial on laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty for obesity. Br J Surg. 2005;92:557-562.
  19. Olbers T, Lonroth H, Dalenback J, et al. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty: an effective long-term therapy for morbidly obese patients? Obes Surg. 2001;11:726 -730.
  20. Olbers T, Lonroth H, Fagevik-Olsen M, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass: development of technique, respiratory function, and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2003;13:364 -370.
  21. Thomsen TK, Jensen VJ, Henriksen MG. In vivo measurement of human body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Eur J Surg. 1998;164:133-137.
  22. Chowdhury B, Sjostrom L, Alpsten M, et al. A multicompartment body composition technique based on computerized tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1994;18:219 -234.
  23. Lindroos AK, Lissner L, Sjostrom L. Validity and reproducibility of a self-administered dietary questionnaire in obese and non-obese subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993;47:461-481.
  24. Sugerman HJ, Londrey GL, Kellum JM, et al. Weight loss with vertical banded gastroplasty and Roux-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity with selective versus random assignment. Am J Surg. 1989;157:93-102.
  25. Lindroos AK, Lissner L, Sjostrom L. Weight change in relation to intake of sugar and sweet foods before and after weight reducing gastric surgery. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996;20:634 -643.
  26. Belachew M, Legrand MJ, Defechereux TH, et al. Laparoscopic adjust- able silicone gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity: a preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:1354 -1356.
  27. Lonroth H, Dalenback J, Haglind E, et al. Vertical banded gastroplasty by laparoscopic technique in the treatment of morbid obesity. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;6:102-107.
  28. Lonroth H, Dalenback J, Haglind E, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass: another option in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 1996;10: 636 -638.
  29. Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopan- creatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514 -523; discussion 524.
  30. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4:353- 357.
  31. Baltasar A, Bou R, Miro J, et al. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: technique and initial experience. Obes Surg. 2002;12:245-248.
  32. See C, Carter PL, Elliott D, et al. An institutional experience with laparoscopic gastric bypass complications seen in the first year com- pared with open gastric bypass complications during the same period. Am J Surg. 2002;183:533-538.
  33. Suter M, Giusti V, Heraief E, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: initial 2-year experience. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:603-609.
  34. Westling A, Gustavsson S. Laparoscopic vs open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2001;11:284 -292.
  35. Higa KD, Ho T, Boone KB. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: technique and 3-year follow-up. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11:377-382.
  36. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y-500 patients: technique and results, with 3-60 month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2000;10:233-239.
  37. Olsen MF, Josefson K, Dalenback J, et al. Respiratory function after laparoscopic and open fundoplication. Eur J Surg. 1997;163:667-672.
  38. Lujan JA, Frutos MD, Hernandez Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized pro- spective study. Ann Surg. 2004;239:433-437.
  39. Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234:279 -289; discussion 289 -291.
  40. Pouliot MC, Despres JP, Lemieux S, et al. Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovas- cular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:460 -468.
  41. Ohrvall M, Berglund L, Vessby B. Sagittal abdominal diameter com- pared with other anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovas- cular risk. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:497-501.
  42. Bigaard J, Tjonneland A, Thomsen BL, et al. Waist circumference, BMI, smoking, and mortality in middle-aged men and women. Obes Res. 2003;11:895-903.
  43. Bosello O, Zamboni M. Visceral obesity and metabolic syndrome. Obes Rev. 2000;1:47-56.
  44. Bjorntorp P. Visceral fat accumulation: the missing link between psy- chosocial factors and cardiovascular disease? J Intern Med. 1991;230: 195-201.
  45. Guney E, Kisakol G, Ozgen G, et al. Effect of weight loss on bone metabolism: comparison of vertical banded gastroplasty and medical intervention. Obes Surg. 2003;13:383-388.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olbers, T., Bj??rkman, S., Lindroos, A., Maleckas, A., L??nn, L., Sj??str??m, L., & L??nroth, H.
Affiliations
Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Olbers, Torsten
  • Maleckas, Almantas
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2006-11
Volume
244
Issue
5
Pages
715-722
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066489101
Cited by
340
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 42
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, bariatric surgery, body composition, dietary intake, energy expenditure, basal metabolic rate, visceral fat, body fat distribution, lean body mass, dietary habits, dietary fat intake
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Calorimetry, Diet, Energy Metabolism, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Obesity, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Period, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Gastric Bypass, Gastroplasty, Absorptiometry, Photon, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review