The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modification in the Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Internet Addiction
Abstract
The Internet is a new technology that has impacted the world and provided many benefits to its users. At the same time the Internet has had negative ramifications. Some people are becoming preoccupied with the Internet, are unable to control their use, and are jeopardizing employment and relationships. The concept of "Internet addiction" has been proposed as an explanation for uncontrollable, damaging use of this technology. Symptoms of excessive Internet use are compared to the criteria used to diagnose other addictions. In particular, pathological gambling is compared to problematic Internet use because of overlapping criteria. This article suggests some modifications to the diagnostic criteria that has been commonly proposed for Internet addiction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder
YOUNG, K. S. (1998) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237 · Cited by 5,513
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630
Caplan, S. E. (2002) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00004-3 · Cited by 1,279
Psychology of Computer Use: XL. Addictive Use of the Internet: A Case That Breaks the Stereotype
Young, K. S. (1996) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3.899 · Cited by 1,108
Davis, R. A., Flett, G. L., & Besser, A. (2002) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/109493102760275581 · Cited by 750
Griffiths, M., & University of Plymouth (1995) · Clinical Psychology Forum · doi:10.53841/bpscpf.1995.1.76.14 · Cited by 443
Cited by
DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale
Hasin, D. S., O’Brien, C. P., Auriacombe, M., Borges, G., Bucholz, K., Budney, A., Compton, W. M., Crowley, T., Ling, W., Petry, N. M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782 · Cited by 1,622
Internet addiction: a systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade
Kuss, D., Griffiths, M., Karila, L., & Billieux, J. (2014) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/13816128113199990617 · Cited by 1,374
Issues for DSM-V: Internet Addiction
Block, J. J. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07101556 · Cited by 1,385
Pathological Video Game Use Among Youths: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study
Gentile, D. A., Choo, H., Liau, A., Sim, T., Li, D., Fung, D., & Khoo, A. (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-1353 · Cited by 1,314
Caplan, S. E. (2002) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00004-3 · Cited by 1,279
Metadata
- Authors
- Beard, K. W., & Wolf, E. M.
- Venue
- CyberPsychology & Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 377-383
- ISSN
- 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8364
- OpenAlex
- W2144802702
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 19.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modification in the Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Internet Addiction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/109493101300210286
- The paper
- Beard, K. W., & Wolf, E. M. (2001). Modification in the Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Internet Addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300210286
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
