Cited by 443Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyChild Development and Digital Technology

Technological addictions

Griffiths, Mark, University of Plymouth·1995·Clinical Psychology Forum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53841/bpscpf.1995.1.76.14

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interest in possible addiction to the Internet, video games, online role-playing games, television, and mobile phones has given rise to a new field of study: technological addictions.

    “The interest in the possible addiction to the Internet, video games, online role-playing games, television, and mobile phones has given rise to a new field of study: technological addictions [3].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffiths, M., & University of Plymouth
Corresponding author
Griffiths, Mark
Venue
Clinical Psychology Forum
Published
1995-02
Volume
1
Issue
76
Pages
14-19
ISSN
  • 1747-5732 (ISSN-L)
  • 2396-8664
OpenAlex
W4315747725
Cited by
443
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
technology addiction, digital addiction, problematic internet use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review