The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Safety of an Astaxanthin-Rich Haematococcus pluvialis Algal Extract: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
A growing body of scientific literature indicates that astaxanthin is a more powerful antioxidant than other carotenoids and vitamin E and may confer numerous health benefits. The purpose of this investigation was to conduct a human safety study with a Haematococcus pluvialis algal extract with high levels of astaxanthin. Thirty-five healthy adults age 35-69 years were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 8 weeks' duration. All participants took three gelcaps per day, one at each meal. Nineteen participants received gelcaps with an algal extract in safflower oil, containing 2 mg of astaxanthin each (treatment); 16 participants received gelcaps containing safflower oil only (placebo). Blood pressure and blood chemistry tests, including a comprehensive metabolic panel and cell blood count, were conducted at the beginning of the trial and after 4 and 8 weeks of supplementation. No significant differences were detected between the treatment and the placebo groups after 8 weeks of supplementation with the algal extract in the parameters analyzed, except for serum calcium, total protein, and eosinophils (P <.01). Although the differences in these three parameters were statistically significant, they were very small and are of no clinical importance. These results reveal that 6 mg of astaxanthin per day from a H. pluvialis algal extract can be safely consumed by healthy adults.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tanaka, T., Kawamori, T., Ohnishi, M., Makita, H., Mori, H., Satoh, K., & Hara, A. (1995) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/16.12.2957 · Cited by 134
O'Connor, I., & O'Brien, N. (1998) · Journal of Dermatological Science · doi:10.1016/s0923-1811(97)00058-3 · Cited by 123
Cited by
Nrf2 signaling pathway: pivotal roles in inflammation
Ahmed, S. M. U., Luo, L., Namani, A., Wang, X. J., & Tang, X. (2017) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.11.005 · Cited by 1,794
High-value products from microalgae—their development and commercialisation
Borowitzka, M. A. (2013) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-013-9983-9 · Cited by 1,585
Astaxanthin decreased oxidative stress and inflammation and enhanced immune response in humans
Park, J. S., Chyun, J. H., Kim, Y. K., Line, L. L., & Chew, B. P. (2010) · Nutrition & Metabolism · doi:10.1186/1743-7075-7-18 · Cited by 569
Astaxanthin in Skin Health, Repair, and Disease: A Comprehensive Review
Davinelli, S., Nielsen, M. E., & Scapagnini, G. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10040522 · Cited by 473
Marine Bioactive Compounds and Their Health Benefits: A Review
Hamed, I., Özogul, F., Özogul, Y., & Regenstein, J. M. (2015) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12136 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Spiller, G. A., & Dewell, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Food
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-56
- ISSN
- 1096-620X (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7600
- OpenAlex
- W1986290782
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety of an Astaxanthin-Rich Haematococcus pluvialis Algal Extract: A Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/109662003765184741
- The paper
- Spiller, G. A., & Dewell, A. (2003). Safety of an Astaxanthin-Rich Haematococcus pluvialis Algal Extract: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Medicinal Food. https://doi.org/10.1089/109662003765184741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.