Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experience with the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System® in a Medical Intensive Care Unit

Goldberg, Philip A., Siegel, Mark D., Russell, Raymond R., Sherwin, Robert S., Halickman, Joshua I., Cooper, Dawn A., Dziura, James D., Inzucchi, Silvio E.·2004·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Strict glycemic control improves clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. However, practical tools for frequent monitoring of blood glucose (BG) levels in the intensive care unit (ICU) are limited. The Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS, Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA) is currently approved for detecting glycemic excursions in outpatients with diabetes mellitus. The use of this device has never been carefully examined in the inpatient setting. This preliminary study was designed to investigate the accuracy of the CGMS in critically ill patients admitted to a medical ICU (MICU). Subjects at risk for hyperglycemia were recruited from among all patients admitted to our MICU. CGMS sensors were implanted for up to 72 h. Study subjects wore between one and five consecutive sensors. Four or more standard capillary BG readings were recorded per 24 h. All paired meter-sensor (M-S) readings were used both for CGMS calibration and for data analysis. Twenty-two MICU patients wore 41 CGMS sensors, yielding 546 M-S BG pairs. Overall, the Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ) was 0.88, with a mean M-S difference of 3.3 +/- 26.7 mg/dL (0.6 +/- 17.4%) and a mean absolute M-S difference of 19.7 +/- 18.3 mg/dL (12.8 +/- 11.9%). Clarke Error Grid analysis categorized 98.7% of the M-S pairs within "clinically acceptable" zones A and B. The CGMS is promising for potential use in critically ill patients. If validated in larger studies, the device could serve as a useful research tool for investigating the role of hyperglycemia (and strict glycemic control) in ICU patients. If further developed as a "real-time" glucose sensor, CGMS technology could ultimately prove clinically useful in the ICU, by decreasing nursing workload and/or by providing alarm signals for impending glycemic excursions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/152091504774198034

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Goldberg, P. A., Siegel, M. D., Russell, R. R., Sherwin, R. S., Halickman, J. I., Cooper, D. A., Dziura, J. D., & Inzucchi, S. E.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2004-06
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
339-347
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2173660670
Cited by
158
References
1
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experience with the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System® in a Medical Intensive Care Unit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/152091504774198034
The paper
Goldberg, P. A., Siegel, M. D., Russell, R. R., Sherwin, R. S., Halickman, J. I., Cooper, D. A., Dziura, J. D., & Inzucchi, S. E. (2004). Experience with the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System® in a Medical Intensive Care Unit. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1089/152091504774198034

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.