The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Ascorbate Depends on the Culture Medium Used to Perform the Assay and Involves Hydrogen Peroxide
Abstract
Reports about the effects of ascorbate (vitamin C) on cultured cells are confusing and conflicting. Some authors show inhibition of cell death by ascorbate, whereas others demonstrate that ascorbate is cytotoxic. In this report, using three different cell types and two different culture media (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and RPMI 1640), we show that the toxicity of ascorbate is due to ascorbate-mediated production of H2O2, to an extent that varies with the medium used to culture the cells. For example, 1 mM ascorbate generates 161 +/- 39 microM H2O2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and induces apoptosis in 50% of HL60 cells, whereas in RPMI 1640 only 83 +/- 17 microM H2O2 is produced and no apoptosis is detected. Apoptosis is prevented by catalase, and direct addition of H2O2 at the above concentration to the cells has similar effects to ascorbate. These results show that ascorbate itself is not toxic to the cell lines used and that effects of ascorbate in vivo cannot be predicted from studies on cultured cells. The ability of ascorbate to interact with different cell culture media to produce H2O2 at different rates could account for many or all of the conflicting results obtained using ascorbate in cultured cell assays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differential regulation of antioxidant enzymes in response to oxidants.
Shull, S., Heintz, N. H., Periasamy, M., Manohar, M., Janssen, Y. M., Marsh, J. P., & Mossman, B. T. (1991) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)54242-3 · Cited by 403
Long, L. H., Clement, M. V., & Halliwell, B. (2000) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.2000.2895 · Cited by 390
Self-citation
Cited by
Halliwell, B., & Whiteman, M. (2004) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705776 · Cited by 2,238
Self-citationBiochemistry of oxidative stress
Halliwell, B. (2007) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0351147 · Cited by 1,543
Self-citationOxidative stress and cancer: Have we moved forward?
Halliwell, B. (2007) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20061131 · Cited by 1,302
Self-citationChen, Q., Espey, M. G., Krishna, M. C., Mitchell, J. B., Corpe, C. P., Buettner, G. R., Shacter, E., & Levine, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506390102 · Cited by 1,075
Ascorbic acid: Chemistry, biology and the treatment of cancer
Du, J., Cullen, J. J., & Buettner, G. R. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2012.06.003 · Cited by 1,070
Metadata
- Authors
- Clément, M.-V., Ramalingam, J., Long, L. H., & Halliwell, B.
- Venue
- Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-163
- ISSN
- 1523-0864 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7716
- OpenAlex
- W1487536884
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Ascorbate Depends on the Culture Medium Used to Perform the Assay and Involves Hydrogen Peroxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/152308601750100687
- The paper
- Clément, M.-V., Ramalingam, J., Long, L. H., & Halliwell, B. (2001). The In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Ascorbate Depends on the Culture Medium Used to Perform the Assay and Involves Hydrogen Peroxide. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. https://doi.org/10.1089/152308601750100687
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.