The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a Sexual Function Questionnaire for Clinical Trials of Female Sexual Dysfunction
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To better evaluate efficacy in clinical trials of drugs as potential treatments for female sexual dysfunctions (FSD), a brief, multidimensional measure of female sexual function was developed. METHODS: Data from semistructured interviews with 82 women with or without FSD, aged 19-65 years, generated a pool of 61 items that addressed aspects of female sexual function. On review by a panel, individual items were selected for face validity and clinical relevance. Thirty-one items were used as a sexual function questionnaire (SFQ-V1) in two multicenter, phase II clinical trials totaling 781 women with FSD. Normative data were generated from a sample of 201 women without FSD. RESULTS: Factor analysis produced seven domains of female sexual function: desire, physical arousal-sensation, physical arousal-lubrication, enjoyment, orgasm, pain, and partner relationship. The internal consistency of the domains ranged from 0.65 to 0.91, and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.21 to 0.71 for Cohen's weighted kappa and 0.42 to 0.78 for Pearson's correlation coefficient. There was a significant difference between the baseline mean SFQ domain scores of patients with FSD compared with those of women without FSD (p < 0.0001). End-of-study SFQ scores were significantly different for women who reported improvement vs. women who reported no improvement (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The SFQ produced seven domains of female sexual function with excellent internal consistency, moderate to good reliability, excellent discriminant validity, and sensitivity. The results suggest that the SFQ may be a valuable new tool for evaluating and diagnosing subsets of FSD and, ultimately, for evaluating treatments of these disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rosen, C. B. (2000) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/009262300278597 · Cited by 6,593
Sexual Dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and Predictors
Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.6.537 · Cited by 5,119
Self-citationBASSON, R., BERMAN, J., BURNETT, A., DEROGATIS, L., FERGUSON, D., FOURCROY, J., GOLDSTEIN, I., GRAZIOTTIN, A., HEIMAN, J., LAAN, E., et al. (2000) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67828-7 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationThe female sexual response: a different model
Basson, R. (2000) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/009262300278641 · Cited by 995
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
Brennan, P., & Silman, A. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491 · Cited by 985
The sexual desire inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability
Spector, I. P., Carey, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1996) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/00926239608414655 · Cited by 671
The DSFI: A multidimensional measure of sexual functioning
Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1979) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/00926237908403732 · Cited by 627
Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunctions: Results from a Decade of Research
Simons, J. S., & Carey, M. P. (2001) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1002729318254 · Cited by 472
Rosen, R. C., Taylor, J. F., Leiblum, S. R., & Bachmann, G. A. (1993) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/00926239308404902 · Cited by 395
Self-citationThe Sexual Activity Questionnaire: A measure of women's sexual functioning
Thirlaway, K., Fallowfield, L., & Cuzick, J. (1996) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf00435972 · Cited by 309
Cited by
The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores
WIEGEL, M., MESTON, C., & ROSEN, R. (2005) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/00926230590475206 · Cited by 2,396
Self-citationHayes, R. D., Dennerstein, L., Bennett, C. M., & Fairley, C. K. (2008) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00768.x · Cited by 301
Keller, A., McGarvey, E. L., & Clayton, A. H. (2006) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/00926230500232909 · Cited by 243
Inventories for male and female sexual dysfunctions
Corona, G., Jannini, E. A., & Maggi, M. (2006) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901410 · Cited by 146
Chevret-Méasson, M., Lavallée, E., Troy, S., Arnould, B., Oudin, S., & Cuzin, B. (2009) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01146.x · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Quirk, F. H., Heiman, J. R., Rosen, R. C., Laan, E., Smith, M. D., & Boolell, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 277-289
- ISSN
- 1524-6094 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2172679188
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a Sexual Function Questionnaire for Clinical Trials of Female Sexual Dysfunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/152460902753668475
- The paper
- Quirk, F. H., Heiman, J. R., Rosen, R. C., Laan, E., Smith, M. D., & Boolell, M. (2002). Development of a Sexual Function Questionnaire for Clinical Trials of Female Sexual Dysfunction. Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1089/152460902753668475
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.