Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Host Feeding Patterns of Established and Potential Mosquito Vectors of West Nile Virus in the Eastern United States

Open access
Apperson, Charles S., Hassan, Hassan K., Harrison, Bruce A., Savage, Harry M., Aspen, Stephen E., Farajollahi, Ary, Crans, Wayne, Daniels, Thomas J., Falco, Richard C., Benedict, Mark, Anderson, Michael, McMillen, Larry, Unnasch, Thomas R.·2004·Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases

Abstract

An important variable in determining the vectorial capacity of mosquito species for arthropod-borne infections is the degree of contact of the vector and the vertebrate reservoir. This parameter can be estimated by examining the host-feeding habits of vectors. Serological and polymerase chain reaction based methods have been used to study the host-feedings patterns of 21 mosquito species from New York, New Jersey, and Tennessee, 19 of which previously have been found infected with West Nile virus. Mammalophilic mosquito species in New Jersey and New York fed primarily upon white-tailed deer, while those from Memphis, Tennessee, fed mainly upon domestic dogs. A total of 24 different avian host species were detected among the avian-derived blood meals. American Robin, Northern Cardinal, Northern Mockingbird, Tufted Titmouse, and Brown-headed Cowbird were common avian hosts, while blood meals derived from the American Crow were relatively rare. Although the majority of common host species were potentially among the most abundant birds at each location, the proportion of blood meals from the most commonly fed upon avian species was greater than was predicted based upon the likely abundance of these species alone. These findings suggest that vector species for West Nile virus may preferentially feed upon certain avian hosts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/153036604773083013

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Apperson, C. S., Hassan, H. K., Harrison, B. A., Savage, H. M., Aspen, S. E., Farajollahi, A., Crans, W., Daniels, T. J., Falco, R. C., Benedict, M., Anderson, M., McMillen, L., & Unnasch, T. R.
Venue
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Published
2004-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
71-82
ISSN
  • 1530-3667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7759
OpenAlex
W2078559285
Cited by
343
References
2
FWCI
23.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Host Feeding Patterns of Established and Potential Mosquito Vectors of West Nile Virus in the Eastern United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/153036604773083013
The paper
Apperson, C. S., Hassan, H. K., Harrison, B. A., Savage, H. M., Aspen, S. E., Farajollahi, A., Crans, W., Daniels, T. J., Falco, R. C., Benedict, M., Anderson, M., McMillen, L., & Unnasch, T. R. (2004). Host Feeding Patterns of Established and Potential Mosquito Vectors of West Nile Virus in the Eastern United States. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1089/153036604773083013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.