Cited by 533Mosquito-borne diseases and controlBird parasitology and diseasesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Host heterogeneity dominates West Nile virus transmission

Open access
Marm Kilpatrick, A, Daszak, Peter, Jones, Matthew J, Marra, Peter P, Kramer, Laura D·2006·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Heterogeneity in host populations and communities can have large effects on the transmission and control of a pathogen. In extreme cases, a few individuals give rise to the majority of secondary infections, which have been termed super spreading events. Here, we show that transmission of West Nile virus (WNV) is dominated by extreme heterogeneity in the host community, resulting in highly inflated reproductive ratios. A single relatively uncommon avian species, American robin ( Turdus migratorius ), appeared to be responsible for the majority of WNV-infectious mosquitoes and acted as the species equivalent of a super spreader for this multi-host pathogen. Crows were also highly preferred by mosquitoes at some sites, while house sparrows were significantly avoided. Nonetheless, due to their relative rarity, corvids (crows and jays) were relatively unimportant in WNV amplification. These results challenge current beliefs about the role of certain avian species in WNV amplification and demonstrate the importance of determining contact rates between vectors and host species to understand pathogen transmission dynamics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2006.3575

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Alexander, D. J. 2000 A review of avian influenza in different bird species. Vet. Microbiol. 74 , 3-13. (doi:10.1016/S03781135(00)00160-7) · DOI
  2. Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. 1991 Infectious diseases of humans. Dynamics and control . London, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. AOU 2005 The A.O.U. check-list of North American birds , vol. 2005, 7th edn, Washington, DC: American Ornithologists Union.
  4. Apperson, C. S. et al . 2004 Host feeding patterns of established and potential mosquito vectors of West Nile virus in the eastern United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 4 , 71-82. (doi:10.1089/153036604773083013) · DOI
  5. Aron, J. L. & May, R. M. 1982 The population biology of malaria. In Population dynamics of infectious diseases: theory and applications (ed. R. M. Anderson), pp. 139-179. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
  6. Biggerstaff, B. & Petersen, L. 2002 Estimated risk of West Nile virus transmission through blood transfusion during an epidemic in Queens, New York City. Transfusion 42 , 1019-1026. (doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00167.x) · DOI
  7. Cohen, J. E. & Gurtler, R. E. 2001 Modeling household transmission of American trypanosomiasis. Science 293 , 694-698. (doi:10.1126/science.1060638) · DOI
  8. Dye, C. & Gay, N. 2003 Modeling the SARS epidemic. Science 300 , 1884-1885. (doi:10.1126/science.1086925) · DOI
  9. Dye, C. & Hasibeder, G. 1986 Population-dynamics of mosquito-borne disease-effects of flies which bite some people more frequently than others. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 80 , 69-77. (doi:10.1016/0035-9203(86) 90199-9) · DOI
  10. Guan, Y. et al . 2004 H5N1 influenza: a protean pandemic threat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 , 8156-8161. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0402443101) · DOI
  11. Hasibeder, G. & Dye, C. 1988 Population-dynamics of mosquito-borne disease-persistence in a completely heterogeneous environment. Theor. Popul. Biol. 33 , 31-53. (doi:10.1016/0040-5809(88)90003-2) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Health Canada. 2006 West Nile virus, vol. 2006. http://www. phac-aspc.gc.ca/wnv-vwn/mon-e.html.
  13. Kauffman, E., Jones, S., Dupuis II, A., Ngo, K., Bernard, K. & Kramer, L. D. 2003 Virus detection protocols for West Nile virus in vertebrate and mosquito specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41 , 3661-3667. (doi:10.1128/JCM.41.8.36613667.2003) · DOI
  14. Kilpatrick, A. M., Kramer, L. D., Jones, M. J., Marra, P. P. & Daszak, P. 2006 West Nile virus epidemics in North America are driven by shifts in mosquito feeding behavior. PLoS Biol. 4 , e82. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040082) · DOI
  15. Leroy, E. M. et al . 2005 Fruit bats as reservoirs of Ebola virus. Nature 438 , 575-576. (doi:10.1038/438575a) · DOI
  16. Swei, A. 2005 a Should we expect population thresholds for wildlife disease? Trends. Ecol. Evol. 20 , 511-519. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.004) · DOI
  17. Lloyd-Smith, J. O., Schreiber, S. J., Kopp, P. E. & Getz, W. M. 2005 b Superspreading and the impact of individual variation on disease emergence. Nature 438 , 355-359. (doi:10.1038/nature04153) · DOI · Paper page
  18. LoGiudice, K., Ostfeld, R. S., Schmidt, K. A. & Keesing, F. 2003 The ecology of infectious disease: effects of host diversity and community composition on Lyme disease risk. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 100 , 567-571. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.0233733100)
  19. Ostfeld, R. S. & Keesing, F. 2000 Biodiversity and disease risk: the case of lyme disease. Conserv. Biol. 14 , 722-728. (doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99014.x) · DOI
  20. Petersen, L. R. & Hayes, E. B. 2004 Westward ho? The spread of West Nile virus. N. Engl J. Med. 351 , 2257-2259. (doi:10.1056/NEJMp048261) · DOI
  21. Sallabanks, R. & James, R. C. 1999 American Robin ( Turdus migratorius ). In The birds of North America , vol. 462 (ed. A. Poole & F. Gill), pp. 1-20. Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences.
  22. Sauer, J. R., Hines, J. E. & Fallon, J. 2005 The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966-2004. Version 2005.2., vol. 2005. Laurel, MD: USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.
  23. Woolhouse, M. E. J. et al . 1997 Heterogeneities in the transmission of infectious agents: implications for the design of control programs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94 , 338-342. (doi:10.1073/pnas.94.1.338) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marm Kilpatrick, A., Daszak, P., Jones, M. J., Marra, P. P., & Kramer, L. D.
Affiliations
  • Consortium for Conservation Medicine460 West 34th Street, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2006-05-23
Volume
273
Issue
1599
Pages
2327-2333
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2135957412
Cited by
533
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 23
FWCI
19.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation
  • National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ai25490-12-0-1)
  • National Museum of Natural History
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (N01 AI025490, #NO1-AI-25490)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
West Nile virus, host heterogeneity, superspreading events, mosquito-bird transmission, American robin, Turdus migratorius, Passer domesticus, Corvidae
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Feeding Behavior, Culicidae, West Nile Fever, West Nile virus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review