Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nontargeted Metabolome Analysis by Use of Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Mass Spectrometry

Open access
Aharoni, Asaph, Ric de Vos, C. H., Verhoeven, Harrie A., Maliepaard, Chris A., Kruppa, Gary, Bino, Raoul, Goodenowe, Dayan B.·2002·OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology

Abstract

Advanced functional genomic tools now allow the parallel and high-throughput analyses of gene and protein expression. Although this information is crucial to our understanding of gene function, it offers insufficient insight into phenotypic changes associated with metabolism. Here we introduce a high-capacity Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Mass Spectrometry (FTMS)–based method, capable of nontargeted metabolic analysis and suitable for rapid screening of similarities and dissimilarities in large collections of biological samples (e.g., plant mutant populations). Separation of the metabolites was achieved solely by ultra-high mass resolution; Identification of the putative metabolite or class of metabolites to which it belongs was achieved by determining the elemental composition of the metabolite based upon the accurate mass determination; and relative quantitation was achieved by comparing the absolute intensities of each mass using internal calibration. Crude plant extracts were introduced via direct (continuous flow) injection and ionized by either electrospray ionization (ESI) or atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) in both positive or negative ionization modes. We first analyzed four consecutive stages of strawberry fruit development and identified changes in the levels of a large range of masses corresponding to known fruit metabolites. The data also revealed novel information on the metabolic transition from immature to ripe fruit. In another set of experiments, the method was used to track changes in metabolic profiles of tobacco flowers overexpressing a strawberry MYB transcription factor and altered in petal color. Only nine masses appeared different between transgenic and control plants, among which was the mass corresponding to cyanidin-3-rhamnoglucoside, the main flower pigment. The results demonstrate the feasibility and utility of the FTMS approach for a nontargeted and rapid metabolic "fingerprinting," which will greatly speed up current efforts to study the metabolome and derive gene function in any biological system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/15362310260256882

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
Aharoni, A., Ric de Vos, C. H., Verhoeven, H. A., Maliepaard, C. A., Kruppa, G., Bino, R., & Goodenowe, D. B.
Venue
OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
Published
2002-07
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
217-234
ISSN
  • 1536-2310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8100
OpenAlex
W1964622469
Cited by
428
References
1
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.