The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Depressive Symptoms among Pregnant Women Screened in Obstetrics Settings
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the prevalence of depressive symptomatology during pregnancy when seen in obstetric settings, the extent of treatment in this population, and specific risk factors associated with mood symptoms in pregnancy. METHODS: A total of 3472 pregnant women age 18 and older were screened while waiting for their prenatal care visits in 10 obstetrics clinics using a brief (10 minute) screening questionnaire. This screen measured demographics, tobacco and alcohol (TWEAK problem alcohol use screening measure), and depression measures, including the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (CES-D), use of antidepressant medications, past history of depression, and current treatment (i.e., medications, psychotherapy, or counseling) for depression. RESULTS: Of women screened, 20% (n = 689) scored above the cutoff score on the CES-D, and only 13.8% of those women reported receiving any formal treatment for depression. Past history of depression, poorer overall health, greater alcohol use consequences, smoking, being unmarried, unemployment, and lower educational attainment were significantly associated with symptoms of depression during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that a substantial number of pregnant women screened in obstetrics settings have significant symptoms of depression, and most of them are not being monitored in treatment during this vulnerable time. This information may be used to justify and streamline systematic screening for depression in clinical encounters with pregnant women as a first step in determining which women may require further treatment for their mood symptoms. As elevations in depressive symptomatology have been associated with adverse maternal and infant outcomes, further study of the impact of psychiatric treatment in gravid women is essential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“however only about 12% to 25% of depressed women receive treatment during the postpartum period (Goodman and Tyer-Viola 2010; Horowitz and Cousins 2006; Marcus et al. 2003).”
From Perinatal Dyadic Psychotherapy for postpartum depression: a randomized controlled pilot trial (2015) · cites this paper as Marcus et al. 2003
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, even if depressed women are identified, few are treated [16].”
From The mastery lifestyle intervention to reduce biopsychosocial risks for pregnant Latinas and African Americans and their infants: protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the absence of systematic screening in routine prenatal care, affected women are often not identified (35–38).”
From Acceptance, experiences, and needs of hospitalized pregnant women toward an electronic mindfulness-based intervention: A pilot mixed-methods study (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Kessler, R. C. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950010008002 · Cited by 12,370
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
Predictors of Postpartum Depression
Beck, C. T. (2001) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-200109000-00004 · Cited by 1,960
Cohort study of depressed mood during pregnancy and after childbirth
Evans, J., Heron, J., Francomb, H., Oke, S., & Golding, J. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7307.257 · Cited by 1,273
Pignone, M. P., Gaynes, B. N., Rushton, J. L., Burchell, C. M., Orleans, C. T., Mulrow, C. D., & Lohr, K. N. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-10-200205210-00013 · Cited by 1,086
A Prospective Study of Emotional Disorders in Childbearing Women
Kumar, R., & Robson, K. M. (1984) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.144.1.35 · Cited by 980
Measures for Clinical Practice: A Sourcebook
Corcoran, K. J., & Fischer, J. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 900
Use of a self-report symptom scale to detect depression in a community sample
Myers, J. K., & Weissman, M. M. (1980) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.137.9.1081 · Cited by 777
Depression and anxiety in early pregnancy and risk for preeclampsia
Kurki, T. (2000) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00602-x · Cited by 690
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Spinelli MG, 1998, J Gender-Specific Med, 1, 33
- Altshuler LL, 1998, J Clin Psychiatry, 59, 9
- Russell M, 1994, Alcohol World, 18, 55
- Cohen LS, 1989, J Clin Psychiatry, 50, 266
- 10.1037//0033-2909.100.3.331 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review
Biaggi, A., Conroy, S., Pawlby, S., & Pariante, C. M. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014 · Cited by 1,657
Risk factors for antenatal depression, postnatal depression and parenting stress
Leigh, B., & Milgrom, J. (2008) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-8-24 · Cited by 888
Prenatal exposure to maternal depression and cortisol influences infant temperament
DAVIS, E. P., GLYNN, L. M., SCHETTER, C. D., HOBEL, C., CHICZ-DEMET, A., & SANDMAN, C. A. (2007) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e318047b775 · Cited by 628
Prenatal depression effects on the fetus and newborn: a review
Field, T., Diego, M., & Hernandez-Reif, M. (2006) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.03.003 · Cited by 592
Davis, E. P., & Sandman, C. A. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01385.x · Cited by 704
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcus, S. M., Flynn, H. A., Blow, F. C., & Barry, K. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Women's Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-380
- ISSN
- 1059-7115 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9996
- 1931-843X
- OpenAlex
- W1992853570
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 20.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy-related medical research
- Keywords
- antenatal depression, depressive symptoms, prenatal screening, antidepressant use, treatment gap, risk factors, alcohol consumption, smoking, marital status, educational attainment, unemployment, CES-D
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude to Health, Depression, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Logistic Models, Women's Health, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
