Investigating the Claims of Konstantin Buteyko, M.D., Ph.D.: The Relationship of Breath Holding Time to End Tidal CO 2 and Other Proposed Measures of Dysfunctional Breathing
Abstract
Objectives Konstantin Buteyko, M.D., Ph.D., claimed that breath holding time (BHT) can be used to detect chronic hyperventilation and that BHT predicts alveolar CO(2) (Pa(CO(2))) according to his patented mathematical formula. The Buteyko Breathing Technique (BBT) is believed to correct chronic hyperventilation as evidenced by increased BHT. In this study, we test Buteyko's claims and explore the relationship between BHT and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)) as well as measures of dysfunctional breathing (DB) including the Nijmegen questionnaire, the Self Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire, and thoracic dominant breathing pattern. Subjects Eighty-three (83) adults healthy or suspected of having dysfunctional breathing, 29 with abnormal spirometry readings, 54 with normal spirometry. Outcome measures BHT, performed according to BBT protocols, was measured along with ETCO(2) and other measures of DB including the Nijmegen questionnaire, and manual assessment of respiratory motion, a palpatory technique for measuring thoraco-abdominal balance during breathing. Correlations between measures of DB were made in the whole sample and also in subgroups with normal or abnormal spirometry. DB measures were compared in normal and abnormal spirometry groups. Results The results revealed a negative correlation between BHT and ETCO(2) (r= -0.241, p Conclusions Although BHT does not predict resting ETCO(2), it does correlate with breathing pattern in subjects with abnormal spirometry. It…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with both elevated Nijmegen questionnaire scores and abnormal breathing patterns as assessed by MARM may benefit from breathing retraining to produce more efficient breathing patterns.
“Patients with both elevated Nijmegen questionnaire scores and abnormal breathing patterns as assessed by MARM may benefit from breathing retraining to produce more efficient breathing patterns [34].”
From Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification (2016) · cites this paper as [34]
Objective assessment tools lack sufficient evidence (BH and BPAT) or are perceived to be too complex for general use (Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion).
“Objective assessment tools lack sufficient evidence (BH 31 and BPAT 14 ) or are perceived to be too complex for general use (Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion 32 ).”
From Physiotherapy assessment of breathing pattern disorder: a qualitative evaluation (2023) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Manning, H. L., & Schwartzstein, R. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512073332307 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Efficacy of Nijmegen questionnaire in recognition of the hyperventilation syndrome
van Dixhoorn, J., & Duivenvoorden, H. J. (1985) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(85)90042-x · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Thomas, M., McKinley, R. K., Freeman, E., & Foy, C. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1098 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Hyperventilation syndrome: an elegant but scientifically untenable concept
HORNSVELD, H., & GARSSEN, B. (1997) · The Netherlands Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0300-2977(96)00080-0 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification
Boulding, R., Stacey, R., Niven, R., & Fowler, S. J. (2016) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0088-2015 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Courtney, R., Greenwood, K. M., & Cohen, M. (2011) · Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.06.004 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationPhysiotherapy assessment of breathing pattern disorder: a qualitative evaluation
Grillo, L., Russell, A.-M., Shannon, H., & Lewis, A. (2023) · BMJ Open Respiratory Research · doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001395 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“The literature suggests that the diaphragm has a dual role in both respiration and mechanical stabilisation of the spine via increased intra-abdominal pressure.”
Background
- Authors
- Courtney, R., & Cohen, M.
- Affiliations
- Private practice, Avalon, New South Wales, Australia.
- RMIT University (AU)
- Venue
- The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-123
- ISSN
- 1075-5535 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7708
- OpenAlex
- W2048776004
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- Buteyko breathing technique, breath holding time, end-tidal carbon dioxide, dysfunctional breathing, Nijmegen questionnaire, breathing therapy, dyspnea
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Breath Tests, Breathing Exercises, Carbon Monoxide, Dyspnea, Female, Humans, Male, Reference Values, Respiration, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spirometry, Tidal Volume, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review