Cited by 11Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Cardiovascular reactivity to and recovery from stressful tasks following a mindfulness analog in college students with a family history of hypertension

Grant, Christoffer, Hobkirk, Andréa, Persons, Elizabeth, Hwang, Vivian, Danoff-Burg, Sharon·2013·The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ninety-seven (97) undergraduates with a family history of hypertension participated in a study that evaluated the effects of a brief mindfulness-induction on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery to two stressors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were randomized to either a mindfulness-induction or control condition and were then exposed to the cold pressor task (CPT) followed by the mirror-tracing task (MT). Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and postinduction, as well as during and immediately following each stressor. RESULTS: There were no group differences in reactivity to either stressor. Participants in the mindfulness-analog condition experienced significantly greater latency to systolic blood pressure recovery following the CPT and a tendency toward greater latency to diastolic blood pressure recovery, although these findings were not replicated with the MT task. CONCLUSIONS: These results are contrary to what was hypothesized and to the anecdotal evidence available regarding effects of comprehensive mindfulness interventions on reactivity. The findings are discussed with respect to purported mechanisms of mindfulness and learning theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/acm.2011.0880

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, C., Hobkirk, A., Persons, E., Hwang, V., & Danoff-Burg, S.
Affiliations
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • University at Albany–State University of New York, Albany, NY.
Venue
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Published
2013-04
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
341-346
ISSN
  • 1075-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7708
OpenAlex
W2088268737
Cited by
11
References
40
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
mindfulness, cardiovascular reactivity, blood pressure recovery, heart rate, cold pressor task, mirror tracing, stress response, family history of hypertension, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Pressure, Cold Temperature, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Psychophysiology, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Meditation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review