Cited by 18Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Facilitators and Barriers to the Integration of Mind–Body Medicine into Primary Care

McGuire, Chelsea, Gabison, Jonathan, Kligler, Benjamin·2016·The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Paradigm, Practice, and Policy Advancing Integrative Health

Abstract

Purpose: To improve understanding of the facilitators and barriers affecting the integration of mind–body medicine (MBM) into primary care and describe the experiences of mind–body primary care providers. Methods: The authors conducted a qualitative analysis of semi-structured telephone interviews with mind–body primary care providers selected via a maximum variation sampling strategy. Results: Four main themes emerged: (1) MBM is an approach to patient care as well as a set of modalities, (2) time and reimbursement pose significant challenges to MBM, (3) support for MBM in one's practice setting is a key facilitator, and (4) commitment to MBM comes from personal experience. “Insufficient time” was the most highly ranked barrier among survey respondents. Interviewees described innovative strategies to overcome barriers, including customized intake forms, MBM training for staff, MBM group visits, and discounted referrals for low-income patients. Conclusions: While increased MBM and self-care training for providers may facilitate the integration of MBM into primary care, systematic changes are needed to decrease time pressures on providers and incentivize patient wellness. Despite barriers, providers are using innovative strategies to provide mind–body primary care in diverse practice settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/acm.2016.0043

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGuire, C., Gabison, J., & Kligler, B.
Affiliations
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Mount Sinai Beth Israel (US)
Corresponding author
Kligler, Benjamin
Venue
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Paradigm, Practice, and Policy Advancing Integrative Health
Published
2016-06
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
437-442
ISSN
  • 1075-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7708
OpenAlex
W2346888456
Cited by
18
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
mind-body medicine, primary care, integration of complementary therapies, barriers and facilitators, provider experiences, time constraints, reimbursement, practice support, employee training, group visits, low-income patients, patient well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Mind-Body Therapies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review