Cited by 43Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Structural and Sociocultural Factors Associated with Cervical Cancer Screening Among HIV-Infected African American Women in Alabama

Open access
Williams, Michelle, Moneyham, Linda, Kempf, Mirjam-Colette, Chamot, Eric, Scarinci, Isabel·2015·AIDS Patient Care and STDs

Abstract

African American women have disproportionately high prevalence rates of HIV and cervical cancer. HIV-infected women are significantly less likely to obtain recommended cervical cancer screenings than HIV-uninfected women. The purpose of this study was to examine sociocultural and structural factors associated with cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected African American in Alabama. The PEN-3 Model and the Health Belief Model were used as theoretical frameworks. In-depth interviews were conducted with twenty HIV-infected African American women to identify perceptions, enablers, and nurturers, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and perceived benefits related to cervical cancer and screening. The most common positive perceptions, enablers, and nurturers that contributed to cervical cancer screening included internal motivation and awareness of the importance of HIV-infected women getting Pap tests due to their weakened immune system. Negative perceptions, enablers, and nurturers included lack of knowledge about cervical cancer and screening, and lack of perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer. The results of this study can be used to guide the development of culturally relevant cervical cancer and screening education interventions aimed at increasing cervical cancer screening adherence among HIV-infected African American women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/apc.2014.0063

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Alabama Department of Public Health. HIV Incidence Estimates 2006–2009 - Alabama. Montgomery, AL: Alabama Department of Public Health, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  2. [20]Massad LS, Seaberg EC, Watts DH, et al. Long-term incidence of cervical cancer in women with HIV. Cancer 2009;115:524–530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, M., Moneyham, L., Kempf, M.-C., Chamot, E., & Scarinci, I.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Michelle
Venue
AIDS Patient Care and STDs
Published
2015-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
13-19
ISSN
  • 1087-2914 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7449
OpenAlex
W2319109509
Cited by
43
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS Patient Care and STDs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (P30-AI-027767, P30CA013148)
  • University of Alabama (P30 CA013148, P30 AI027767)
  • National Institutes of Health (P30-AI- 027767, CCSG P30, P30-CA- 013148, CA013148, AI027767)
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington (P30 AI027767, AI027767)
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of Alabama at Birmingham (AI027767, P30 AI027767)
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • National Cancer Institute (CA013148, P30CA013148)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI027767, AI027767)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, women living with HIV, African American women, PEN-3 model, Health Belief Model, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, sociocultural factors, structural factors, Pap smear, culturally appropriate health education, Alabama
MeSH terms
Adult, Alabama, Black or African American, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Population, Vaginal Smears, HIV Infections, Qualitative Research, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities, Early Detection of Cancer, Papanicolaou Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review