Cited by 50Cancer-related molecular mechanisms researchDNA Repair MechanismsMicroRNA in disease regulation

Noncoding RNAs in DNA Repair and Genome Integrity

Open access
Wan, Guohui, Liu, Yunhua, Han, Cecil, Zhang, Xinna, Lu, Xiongbin·2014·Antioxidants & Redox Signaling

Abstract

Significance: The well-studied sequences in the human genome are those of protein-coding genes, which account for only 1%–2% of the total genome. However, with the advent of high-throughput transcriptome sequencing technology, we now know that about 90% of our genome is extensively transcribed and that the vast majority of them are transcribed into noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). It is of great interest and importance to decipher the functions of these ncRNAs in humans. Recent Advances: In the last decade, it has become apparent that ncRNAs play a crucial role in regulating gene expression in normal development, in stress responses to internal and environmental stimuli, and in human diseases. Critical Issues: In addition to those constitutively expressed structural RNA, such as ribosomal and transfer RNAs, regulatory ncRNAs can be classified as microRNAs (miRNAs), Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). However, little is known about the biological features and functional roles of these ncRNAs in DNA repair and genome instability, although a number of miRNAs and lncRNAs are regulated in the DNA damage response. Future Directions: A major goal of modern biology is to identify and characterize the full profile of ncRNAs with regard to normal physiological functions and roles in human disorders. Clinically relevant ncRNAs will also be evaluated and targeted in therapeutic applications. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 20, 655–677.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ars.2013.5514

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wan, G., Liu, Y., Han, C., Zhang, X., & Lu, X.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lu, Xiongbin
Venue
Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
Published
2014-02
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
655-677
ISSN
  • 1523-0864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7716
OpenAlex
W2073834084
Cited by
50
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antioxidants and Redox Signaling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA136549, CA136549., P50CA083639)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
Keywords
non-coding RNA, DNA repair, genome stability, genomic instability, DNA damage response, long non-coding RNA, microRNA, piRNA, siRNA, small nucleolar RNA, gene expression regulation, stress response
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Reactive Oxygen Species, RNA, Untranslated, RNA Transport, RNA Interference, Genomic Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review