Cited by 327Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsLight effects on plantsRemote Sensing in Agriculture

Spectral Signatures of Photosynthesis. I. Review of Earth Organisms

Open access
Kiang, Nancy Y., Siefert, Janet, Govindjee, Blankenship, Robert E.·2007·Astrobiology

Abstract

Why do plants reflect in the green and have a "red edge" in the red, and should extrasolar photosynthesis be the same? We provide (1) a brief review of how photosynthesis works, (2) an overview of the diversity of photosynthetic organisms, their light harvesting systems, and environmental ranges, (3) a synthesis of photosynthetic surface spectral signatures, and (4) evolutionary rationales for photosynthetic surface reflectance spectra with regard to utilization of photon energy and the planetary light environment. We found the "near-infrared (NIR) end" of the red edge to trend from blue-shifted to reddest for (in order) snow algae, temperate algae, lichens, mosses, aquatic plants, and finally terrestrial vascular plants. The red edge is weak or sloping in lichens. Purple bacteria exhibit possibly a sloping edge in the NIR. More studies are needed on pigment-protein complexes, membrane composition, and measurements of bacteria before firm conclusions can be drawn about the role of the NIR reflectance. Pigment absorbance features are strongly correlated with features of atmospheric spectral transmittance: P680 in Photosystem II with the peak surface incident photon flux density at approximately 685 nm, just before an oxygen band at 687.5 nm; the NIR end of the red edge with water absorbance bands and the oxygen A-band at 761 nm; and bacteriochlorophyll reaction center wavelengths with local maxima in atmospheric and water transmittance spectra. Given the surface incident photon flux density spectrum and resonance transfer in light harvesting, we propose some rules with regard to where photosynthetic pigments will peak in absorbance: (1) the wavelength of peak incident photon flux; (2) the longest available wavelength for core antenna or reaction center pigments; and (3) the shortest wavelengths within an atmospheric window for accessory pigments. That plants absorb less green light may not be an inefficient legacy of evolutionary history, but may actually satisfy the above criteria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ast.2006.0105

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is not possible to map a red edge detection to surface biomass because near-infrared reflectance depends on numerous vegetation properties such as leaf thickness and canopy structure.

    “However, it is not possible to map a red edge detection to surface biomass because near-infrared reflectance depends on numerous vegetation properties such as leaf thickness and canopy structure (71).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Clegg, R. M. (2004). Nuts and Bolts of Excitation Energy Migration and Energy Transfer. Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis. G. C. P. a. Govindjee. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer. 19: 1-41.
  2. Cooper-Driver, G. A. (2001). Biological roles for phenolic compounds in the evolution of early land plants. Plants Invade the Land. D. E. Patricia G. Gensel. New York, Columbia University Press: 159-172.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiang, N. Y., Siefert, J., Govindjee, & Blankenship, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US)
  • NASA Astrobiology Institute (US)
  • Departments of Plant Biology and Biochemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Astrobiology
Published
2007-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
222-251
ISSN
  • 1531-1074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8070
OpenAlex
W2050842197
Cited by
327
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astrobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Keywords
photosynthesis, red edge, surface reflectance spectra, photosynthetic organisms, light harvesting, photosynthetic pigments, atmospheric transmission, oxygen A-band, P680, photosystem II, bacteriochlorophyll, purple bacteria, lichens, algae, bryophytes
MeSH terms
Climate, Electron Transport, Biological Evolution, Extraterrestrial Environment, Light, Photosynthesis, Pigments, Biological, Plants, Ultraviolet Rays, Planets, Ecosystem, Earth, Planet, Exobiology, Space Simulation, Evolution, Planetary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review