Cited by 136Space Science and Extraterrestrial LifeStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesPlanetary Science and Exploration

Detectability of Planetary Characteristics in Disk-Averaged Spectra II: Synthetic Spectra and Light-Curves of Earth

Tinetti, Giovanna, Meadows, Victoria S., Crisp, David, Kiang, Nancy Y., Kahn, Brian H., Bosc, Emmanuel, Fishbein, Evan, Velusamy, Thangasamy +1 more·2006·Astrobiology

Abstract

Spatially and spectrally resolved models were used to explore the observational sensitivity to changes in atmospheric and surface properties and the detectability of surface biosignatures in the globally averaged spectra and light-curves of the Earth. Compared with previous efforts to characterize the Earth using disk-averaged models, a more comprehensive and realistic treatment of the surface and atmosphere was taken into account here. Our results are presented as a function of viewing geometry and phases at both visible/near-infrared (0.5-1.7 microm) and mid-infrared (5-25 microm) wavelength ranges, applicable to the proposed NASA-Terrestrial Planet Finder visible coronagraph and mid-infrared interferometer and to the ESADarwin mission architectures. Clouds can change the thermal emission by as much as 50% compared with the cloud-free case and increase the visible albedo by up to 500% for completely overcast cases at the dichotomy phase. Depending on the observed phase and their distribution and type, clouds can also significantly alter the spectral shape. Moreover, clouds impact the detectability of surface biosignatures in the visible wavelength range. Modeling the disk-averaged sensitivity to the "red-edge," a distinctive spectral signature of vegetation, showed that Earth's land vegetation could be seen in disk-averaged spectra, even with cloud cover, when the signal was averaged over the daily time scale. We found that vegetation is more readily discriminated from clouds at dichotomy (50% illumination) rather than at full phase. The detectability of phytoplankton was also explored, but was found to be more difficult to detect in the disk-average than land vegetation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ast.2006.6.881

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tinetti et al. (70) also considered marine plankton detectability and found that even on planets with shallow oceans and an order of magnitude more plankton than the modern Earth, the disc-integrated spectral features would be weaker than the vegetation signal.

    “Tinetti et al. (70) also considered marine plankton detectability and found that even on planets with shallow oceans and an order of magnitude more plankton than the modern Earth, the disc-integrated spectral features would be weaker than the vegetation signal.”
  • Tinetti et al. (70) showed that the vegetative red edge is potentially detectable with next-generation direct imaging, though challenging with realistic clouds.

    “Tinetti et al. (70) showed that the vegetative red edge is potentially detectable with next-generation direct imaging, though challenging with realistic clouds.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tinetti, G., Meadows, V. S., Crisp, D., Kiang, N. Y., Kahn, B. H., Bosc, E., Fishbein, E., Velusamy, T., & Turnbull, M.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
Venue
Astrobiology
Published
2006-12
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
881-900
ISSN
  • 1531-1074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8070
OpenAlex
W2036448275
Cited by
136
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Astrobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
biosignatures, light curves, synthetic spectra, clouds, red edge, vegetation, phytoplankton, atmospheric models, surface albedo, Terrestrial Planet Finder, Darwin mission, viewing geometry, phase dependence, mid-infrared, near-infrared
MeSH terms
Atmosphere, Light, Models, Theoretical, Spectrum Analysis, Earth, Planet, Exobiology, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review