Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The NASA Roadmap to Ocean Worlds

Open access
Hendrix, Amanda R., Hurford, Terry A., Barge, Laura M., Bland, Michael T., Bowman, Jeff S., Brinckerhoff, William, Buratti, Bonnie J., Cable, Morgan L., Castillo-Rogez, Julie, Collins, Geoffrey C., Diniega, Serina, German, Christopher R., Hayes, Alexander G., Hoehler, Tori, Hosseini, Sona, Howett, Carly J.A., McEwen, Alfred S., Neish, Catherine D., Neveu, Marc, Nordheim, Tom A., Patterson, G. Wesley, Patthoff, D. Alex, Phillips, Cynthia, Rhoden, Alyssa, Schmidt, Britney E., Singer, Kelsi N., Soderblom, Jason M., Vance, Steven D.·2019·Astrobiology

Abstract

In this article, we summarize the work of the NASA Outer Planets Assessment Group (OPAG) Roadmaps to Ocean Worlds (ROW) group. The aim of this group is to assemble the scientific framework that will guide the exploration of ocean worlds, and to identify and prioritize science objectives for ocean worlds over the next several decades. The overarching goal of an Ocean Worlds exploration program as defined by ROW is to "identify ocean worlds, characterize their oceans, evaluate their habitability, search for life, and ultimately understand any life we find." The ROW team supports the creation of an exploration program that studies the full spectrum of ocean worlds, that is, not just the exploration of known ocean worlds such as Europa but candidate ocean worlds such as Triton as well. The ROW team finds that the confirmed ocean worlds Enceladus, Titan, and Europa are the highest priority bodies to target in the near term to address ROW goals. Triton is the highest priority candidate ocean world to target in the near term. A major finding of this study is that, to map out a coherent Ocean Worlds Program, significant input is required from studies here on Earth; rigorous Research and Analysis studies are called for to enable some future ocean worlds missions to be thoughtfully planned and undertaken. A second finding is that progress needs to be made in the area of collaborations between Earth ocean scientists and extraterrestrial ocean scientists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ast.2018.1955

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Hendrix, A. R., Hurford, T. A., Barge, L. M., Bland, M. T., Bowman, J. S., Brinckerhoff, W., Buratti, B. J., Cable, M. L., Castillo-Rogez, J., Collins, G. C., Diniega, S., German, C. R., Hayes, A. G., Hoehler, T., Hosseini, S., Howett, C. J. A., McEwen, A. S., Neish, C. D., Neveu, M., Nordheim, T. A., Patterson, G. W., Patthoff, D. A., Phillips, C., Rhoden, A., Schmidt, B. E., Singer, K. N., Soderblom, J. M., & Vance, S. D.
Venue
Astrobiology
Published
2019-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
1-27
ISSN
  • 1531-1074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8070
OpenAlex
W2897449364
Cited by
320
References
71
FWCI
16.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The NASA Roadmap to Ocean Worlds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ast.2018.1955
The paper
Hendrix, A. R., Hurford, T. A., Barge, L. M., Bland, M. T., Bowman, J. S., Brinckerhoff, W., Buratti, B. J., Cable, M. L., Castillo-Rogez, J., Collins, G. C., Diniega, S., German, C. R., Hayes, A. G., Hoehler, T., Hosseini, S., Howett, C. J. A., McEwen, A. S., Neish, C. D., Neveu, M., . . . Vance, S. D. (2019). The NASA Roadmap to Ocean Worlds. Astrobiology. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1955

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.