Cited by 66Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Speaking Autistic Adults: Overview and Recommendations

Open access
Zisk, Alyssa Hillary, Dalton, Elizabeth·2019·Autism in Adulthood

Abstract

In recent years, technologies used for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) have seen increasing development and availability. As a result, more and more autistic people are using AAC. With the increased use of AAC by autistic people, research on autism and AAC has also increased. However, the vast majority of this research focuses on nonspeaking autistic children. AAC use by autistic adults and by speaking autistic people has received limited academic attention. Speaking autistic adults often use AAC and many have publicly shared information about their strategies and experiences. In this article, we provide an overview of the speech differences autistic adults choose to support through AAC, including varying difficulties with speech depending on environment and content. We also discuss the technologies and strategies adopted by autistic adults, including free or low-cost tools that are not specific to AAC, mobile technologies, and signed languages or gestures. We explore barriers to AAC use, including a lack of awareness of relevant options, misconceptions about who AAC supports are for, and the cost of dedicated AAC applications or devices. We then provide suggestions for autistic adults, people supporting autistic adults, and researchers. Overall communication—rather than speech—should be prioritized. Mainstream communication technologies can support communication for autistic adults and a variety of tools can support communication across contexts. Further research into the use and effectiveness of AAC for autistic adults is needed, as is research on barriers to AAC use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/aut.2018.0007

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many non-speaking or minimally speaking autistic people use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods, including visual cards, writing or electronic devices.

    “Many non-speaking or minimally speaking autistic people use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods, including visual cards, writing or electronic devices, which should be facilitated (Zisk and Dalton, 2019).”

    From Autistic SPACE: a novel framework for meeting the needs of autistic people in healthcare settings (2023) · cites this paper as Zisk and Dalton, 2019

    The Speech for autistic adults section describes communication cards, writing and mobile AAC applications, and the recommendations say AAC should be encouraged when it supports communication. But those examples primarily concern speaking autistic adults; the paper does not establish that many nonspeaking or minimally speaking autistic people use the listed methods. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [20]20. Wayman L, Rothschild C, Cummings C. But You Can Talk! Alternative Communication for Verbal Individuals with ASD. Presented at 49th Annual Autism Society National Conference; July 12-15, 2017; Milwaukee, WI. https://asa.confex.com/asa/2017/webprogramarchives/ Session9756.html Accessed December 10, 2017.
  2. [21]21. Sequenzia A, Grace EJ, eds. Typed Words, Loud Voices. Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press; 2015.
  3. [24]24. American Psychiatric Association. Anxiety disorders. In: Di- agnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.books .9780890425596.dsm05 · DOI
  4. [25]25. Sinclair J. Autism Network International: The development of a community and its culture. In Bascom J, ed. Loud Hands: Autistic People Speaking. Washington, DC: The Autistic Press; 2012;22-70.
  5. [27]27. Sibley KA. My cat comes when my tablet calls him. In: Sequenzia A, Grace EJ, eds. Typed Words, Loud Voices. Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press; 2015;60-62.
  6. [28]28. Allen B. Notes on not speaking. In: Sequenzia A, Grace EJ, eds. Typed Words, Loud Voices. Fort Worth, TX: Autono- mous Press; 2015;29-30.
  7. [29]29. Baggs A. Autism, speech, and assistive technology. In: Bascom J, ed. Loud Hands: Autistic People Speaking. Washington, DC: The Autistic Press; 2012;320-323.
  8. [31]31. Kimmel A. Interview. In: Sequenzia A, Grace EJ, eds. Typed Words, Loud Voices. Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press; 2015;29-30.
  9. [32]32. von Woerkom A. June 16, 2002. In: Sequenzia A, Grace EJ, eds. Typed Words, Loud Voices. Fort Worth, TX: Au- tonomous Press; 2015;30-31.
  10. [33]33. Kim C. A barrier of sound, not of feeling. In: Sequenzia A, Grace EJ, eds. Typed Words, Loud Voices. Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press; 2015;17-20.
  11. [36]36. Williams M. The internet and AAC. Alternatively Speak- ing. 1995;2(3):1-6.
  12. [38]38. Sedgewick MZ. The rugged beauty of creating a neuroqueer space. In Ryskamp D, Harvey S, eds. Spoon Knife 2: Test Chamber. Fort Worth, TX: Neuroqueer Press; 2017;140-151.
  13. [43]43. Jones SR. The song of life unfolding. In: Sequenzia A, Grace EJ, eds. Typed Words, Loud Voices. Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press; 2015;119-124.
  14. [44]44. Anonymous. My many communication systems. In: Se- quenzia A, Grace EJ, eds. Typed Words, Loud Voices. Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press; 2015;90-96.
  15. [58]58. Elmore K, Meloncon L, James CA. Embracing interde- pendence: Technology developers, autistic users, and technical communicators. In: Meloncon L, ed. Rhetorical Accessability: At the Intersection of Technical Commu- nication and Disability Studies. New York, NY: Routledge; 2014;15-38.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zisk, A. H., & Dalton, E.
Affiliations
University of Rhode Island (US)
Corresponding author
Zisk, Alyssa Hillary
Venue
Autism in Adulthood
Published
2019-04-13
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
93-100
ISSN
  • 2573-9581 (ISSN-L)
  • 2573-959X
OpenAlex
W2922206321
Cited by
66
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism in Adulthood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
augmentative and alternative communication, autistic adults, speaking difficulties, sign language, gesture, mobile communication technology, communication support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review