Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Standard Preanalytical Coding for Biospecimens: Review and Implementation of the Sample PREanalytical Code (SPREC)

Open access
Lehmann, Sabine, Guadagni, Fiorella, Moore, Helen, Ashton, Garry, Barnes, Michael, Benson, Erica, Clements, Judith, Koppandi, Iren, Coppola, Domenico, Demiroglu, Sara Yasemin, DeSouza, Yvonne, De Wilde, Annemieke, Duker, Jacko, Eliason, James, Glazer, Barbara, Harding, Keith, Jeon, Jae Pil, Kessler, Joseph, Kokkat, Theresa, Nanni, Umberto, Shea, Kathi, Skubitz, Amy, Somiari, Stella, Tybring, Gunnel, Gunter, Elaine, Betsou [International Society for Biological and Environment, Fotini·2012·Biopreservation and Biobanking

Abstract

The first version of the Standard PREanalytical Code (SPREC) was developed in 2009 by the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) Biospecimen Science Working Group to facilitate documentation and communication of the most important preanalytical quality parameters of different types of biospecimens used for research. This same Working Group has now updated the SPREC to version 2.0, presented here, so that it contains more options to allow for recent technological developments. Existing elements have been fine tuned. An interface to the Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality (BRISQ) has been defined, and informatics solutions for SPREC implementation have been developed. A glossary with SPREC-related definitions has also been added.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/bio.2012.0012

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Lehmann, S., Guadagni, F., Moore, H., Ashton, G., Barnes, M., Benson, E., Clements, J., Koppandi, I., Coppola, D., Demiroglu, S. Y., DeSouza, Y., De Wilde, A., Duker, J., Eliason, J., Glazer, B., Harding, K., Jeon, J. P., Kessler, J., Kokkat, T., Nanni, U., Shea, K., Skubitz, A., Somiari, S., Tybring, G., Gunter, E., & Betsou [International Society for Biological and Environment, F.
Venue
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Published
2012-08
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
366-374
ISSN
  • 1947-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-5543
OpenAlex
W2045659058
Cited by
181
References
0
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standard Preanalytical Coding for Biospecimens: Review and Implementation of the Sample PREanalytical Code (SPREC). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/bio.2012.0012
The paper
Lehmann, S., Guadagni, F., Moore, H., Ashton, G., Barnes, M., Benson, E., Clements, J., Koppandi, I., Coppola, D., Demiroglu, S. Y., DeSouza, Y., De Wilde, A., Duker, J., Eliason, J., Glazer, B., Harding, K., Jeon, J. P., Kessler, J., Kokkat, T., . . . Betsou [International Society for Biological and Environment, F. (2012). Standard Preanalytical Coding for Biospecimens: Review and Implementation of the Sample PREanalytical Code (SPREC). Biopreservation and Biobanking. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2012.0012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.