Cited by 44Treatment of Major DepressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Maintenance study for adolescent depression

Cheung, Amy, Kusumakar, Vivek, Kutcher, Stan, Dubo, Elyse, Garland, Jane, Weiss, Margaret, Kiss, Alex, Levitt, Anthony·2008·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Objective Although recent studies and meta-analyses confirm the efficacy of antidepressants in the acute phase of treatment for adolescent depression, there are few data available to allow assessment of the value of continued use of antidepressants in depressed adolescents after acute response. This study examines the benefit of maintenance treatment with sertraline in adolescents aged 13-19 years with major depression using a multi-site randomized placebo controlled discontinuation design. Methods Subjects with a diagnosis of depression who responded to open-label treatment with sertraline in a 12-week acute phase and did not relapse with open-label continuation treatment for 24 weeks were randomized to placebo or continued treatment with sertraline for 52 weeks. Results Twenty-two subjects were randomized to maintenance treatment with sertraline (n = 13) versus placebo (n = 9). A higher proportion of subjects treated with sertraline (38%) remained well as compared to those on placebo (0%). Survival analyses found no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.17). Conclusions This is the first study to examine the outcome to maintenance treatment for adolescents with major depression. Although the sample size was small, the findings suggest a possible benefit of maintenance treatment with sertraline over placebo. A larger clinical trial with adequate power is required to confirm or disconfirm these findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cap.2008.0001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During acute treatment, one trial openly treated all participants with sertraline and two others with fluoxetine.

    “During the acute phase of treatment, one trial openly treated all participants with sertraline (Cheung 2008) and two others treated participants with fluoxetine (Emslie 2008; Kennard 2008).”
  • In the other two trials, acute phase treatment lasted 9-12 weeks, followed by continuation of 10-24 weeks, then maintenance and re-randomisation.

    “In the other two trials, acute phase treatment lasted between 9 and 12 weeks, followed by a continuation phase of between 10 (Emslie 2004) and 24 weeks (Cheung 2008), after which participants entered a maintenance phase and again, were re-randomised into a potentially new treatment arm.”
  • Four trials contained continuation or maintenance phases specifically designed to prevent relapse-recurrence after initial response.

    “Four trials contained continuation or maintenance phases (or both) specifically designed to prevent relapse-recurrence after initial response, and involved only those participants who had responded or remitted after an acute phase of treatment (Cheung 2008; Emslie 2004; Emslie 2008; Kennard 2008).”
  • Sample sizes in acute phase ranged 66-219; in relapse-prevention phase ranged 22-102.

    “Sample sizes in the acute phase of treatment ranged from 66 (Kennard 2008) to 219 participants (Emslie 2004), and in the relapse-prevention phase ranged from 22 (Cheung 2008) to 102 participants (Emslie 2008).”
  • Three trials (Cheung 2008; Emslie 2004; Emslie 2008) provided data suitable for at least one outcome in the meta-analysis.

    “Three trials (Cheung 2008; Emslie 2004; Emslie 2008) provided data suitable for at least one outcome in the meta-analysis.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheung, A., Kusumakar, V., Kutcher, S., Dubo, E., Garland, J., Weiss, M., Kiss, A., & Levitt, A.
Affiliations
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2008-08
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
389-394
ISSN
  • 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8992
OpenAlex
W2087760961
Cited by
44
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Dalhousie University
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
adolescent depression, major depressive disorder, sertraline, maintenance therapy, relapse prevention, survival analysis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Time Factors, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Sertraline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review