Cited by 94Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Duloxetine in the prevention of relapse of major depressive disorder: Double-blind placebo-controlled study

Open access
Perahia, David G., Gilaberte, Inmaculada, Wang, Fujun, Wiltse, Curtis G., Huckins, Stacy A., Clemens, Jeffrey W., Montgomery, Stuart A., Montejo, Angel L. +1 more·2006·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relapse rates may be as high as 50% in people with major depressive disorder (MDD) previously treated to remission. AIMS: Duloxetine, an inhibitor of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake that is licensed in Europe, the USA and elsewhere for the treatment of depressive episodes, was evaluated with regard to its efficacy, safety and tolerability in the prevention of relapse of MDD. METHOD: Adult out-patients with MDD received duloxetine (60 mg daily) for 12 weeks (n=533). Patients who responded to the drug were then randomised to duloxetine(60 mg daily)(n=136) or or placebo placebo (n=142) for 26 weeks. The primary measure of efficacy was time to relapse. RESULTS: Patients who received duloxetine (60 mg daily) experienced significantly longer times to relapse of MDD, and better efficacy, global well-being, and quality-of-life outcomes compared with patients who received placebo. It should be noted that adverse events which occur in discontinuation may mimic some signs of depressive relapse, and were not specifically elicited in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine (60 mg daily) is effective in the prevention of relapse of MDD during continuation treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.188.4.346

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results of the first levomilnacipran ER relapse-prevention study are inconsistent with relapse-prevention outcomes reported in the literature for trials of other SNRIs versus placebo (e.g., venlafaxine, 28% vs. 52%; desvenlafaxine, 24% vs. 42%; duloxetine, 21.9% vs. 43.1%).

    “the results of the first levomilnacipran ER relapse‐prevention study are inconsistent with relapse‐prevention outcomes reported in the literature for trials of other SNRIs versus placebo (e.g., venlafaxine, 28% vs. 52%; desvenlafaxine, 24% vs. 42%; duloxetine, 21.9% vs. 43.1%; Perahia et al., 2006; Rickels et al., 2010; Simon, Aguiar, Kunz, & Lei, 2004).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perahia, D. G., Gilaberte, I., Wang, F., Wiltse, C. G., Huckins, S. A., Clemens, J. W., Montgomery, S. A., Montejo, A. L., & Detke, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2006-04
Volume
188
Issue
4
Pages
346-353
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2235189311
Cited by
94
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
duloxetine, major depressive disorder, relapse prevention, continuation treatment, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, antidepressant efficacy, adverse events, quality of life, outpatients
MeSH terms
Duloxetine Hydrochloride, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Thiophenes, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review