Cited by 96Obesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

What’s on YouTube? A Case Study on Food and Beverage Advertising in Videos Targeted at Children on Social Media

Open access
Tan, LeeAnn, Ng, See Hoe, Omar, Azahadi, Karupaiah, Tilakavati·2018·Childhood Obesity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unhealthy food marketing to children is a key risk factor for childhood obesity. Online video platforms have surpassed television as the primary choice for screen viewing among children but the extent of food marketing through such media is relatively unknown. We aimed to examine food and beverage advertisements (ads) encountered in YouTube videos targeting children in Malaysia. METHODS: The social media analytics site SocialBlade.com was used to identify the most popular YouTube videos (n = 250) targeting children. Ads encountered while viewing these videos were recorded and analyzed for type of product promoted and ad format (video vs. overlay). Food and beverage ads were further coded based on food category and persuasive marketing techniques used. RESULTS: In total 187 ads were encountered in sampled videos. Food and beverage ads were the most common at 38% (n=71), among which 56.3% (n = 40) promoted noncore foods. Ads for noncore foods were more commonly delivered as video rather than overlay ads. Among ads promoting noncore foods, the most commonly employed persuasive marketing techniques found were taste appeal (42.3%), uniqueness/novelty (32.4%), the use of animation (22.5%), fun appeal (22.5%), use of promotional characters (15.5%), price (12.7%), and health and nutrition benefits (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to television, unhealthy food ads predominate in content aimed toward children on YouTube. Policies regulating food marketing to children need to be extended to cover online content in line with a rapidly-evolving digital media environment. Service providers of social media can play a part in limiting unhealthy food advertising to children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/chi.2018.0037

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [11]11. Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G. The extent, nature and effects of food promotion to children: A review of the evidence. Technical paper prepared for the World Health Organization, 2009.
  2. [15]15. Kelly B, Hebden L, King L, et al. Children's exposure to food advertising on free-to-air television: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Health Promot Int 2014;31:144-152.
  3. [32]32. Vandevijvere S, Sagar K, Kelly BP, Swinburn B. Unhealthy food marketing to New Zealand children and adolescents through the internet. New Zeal Med Assoc 2017;130:32-43.
  4. [48]48. Zuppa JA, Morton H, Mehta KP. Television food advertising: Counterproductive to children's health? A content analysis using the Australian Guide to Health Eating. Nutr Diet 2003;60:78-84.
  5. [51]51. Buzzi M. What are your children watching on YouTube? In: Cipolla-Ficarra F, Veltman K, Verber D, Cipolla-Ficarra M, Kammu ¨ller F (ed), Advances in New Technologies, Interactive Interfaces and Communicability ADNTIIC 2011. Berlin, Heidel- berg: Springer, 2011, pp. 243-252.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, L., Ng, S. H., Omar, A., & Karupaiah, T.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Health (MY)
  • Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
  • Taylor's University (MY)
Corresponding author
Tan, LeeAnn
Venue
Childhood Obesity
Published
2018-07
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
280-290
ISSN
  • 2153-2168 (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-2176
OpenAlex
W2824603618
Cited by
96
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Childhood Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
food marketing to children, beverage advertising, YouTube, online video advertising, social media regulation, Malaysia
MeSH terms
Advertising, Beverages, Child, Food, Humans, Persuasive Communication, Television, Food Industry, Social Media, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review