Cited by 63Technology Adoption and User BehaviourConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceConsumer Retail Behavior Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Attitudes Toward Buying Online as Predictors of Shopping Online for British and American Respondents

Yang, Bijou, Lester, David, James, Simon·2007·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

This study compared the attitudes toward online shopping of British and American individuals. Using a sample of 327 British and American university students, the British respondents were found to have less favorable attitudes toward online shopping. Attitudes toward online shopping were found to be significant predictors of making online purchases. The implications of these results were discussed and suggestions made for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cpb.2006.9968

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attitude towards online shopping is a significant predictor of purchasing behavior.

    “Previous research has revealed attitude towards online shopping is a significant predictor of making online purchases (Yang et al., 2007) and purchasing behavior (George, 2004;Yang et al., 2007).”

    From An Analysis of Factors Affecting on Online Shopping Behavior of Consumers (2012) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2007

  • Attitude towards online shopping is a significant predictor of making online purchases.

    “Previous research has revealed attitude towards online shopping is a significant predictor of making online purchases (Yang et al., 2007) and purchasing behavior (George, 2004;Yang et al., 2007).”

    From An Analysis of Factors Affecting on Online Shopping Behavior of Consumers (2012) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2007

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Mummalaneni V., 2005, Journal of Business Strategy, 58, 526
  2. 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00051-3 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00067-5 · DOI
  4. Hong W., 2005, Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 149, 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045812 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/0959396032000099088 · DOI
  6. 10.1108/02634500310458135 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/0144929021000018342 · DOI
  8. 10.1089/109493104322820156 · DOI
  9. 10.1086/259630 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yang, B., Lester, D., & James, S.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Stockton University (US)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2007-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
198-203
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W2088691470
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Keywords
online shopping, online purchase intention, cross-cultural comparison, UK consumers, United States consumers, university students, e-commerce
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Computers, Consumer Behavior, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Economics, England, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Risk-Taking, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review