Cited by 62Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsGender and Technology in Education

What Children Do on the Internet: Domains Visited and Their Relationship to Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Academic Performance

Jackson, Linda A., Samona, Ricky, Moomaw, Jeff, Ramsay, Lauren, Murray, Christopher, Smith, Amy, Murray, Lindsay·2007·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

HomeNetToo is a longitudinal field study designed to examine the antecedents and consequences of home Internet use in low-income families. Participants included 140 children, mostly 13-year-old African American (83%) boys (58%), living in single-parent households (75%) where the median annual income was $15,000 (USD). This report focuses on children's Internet activities, socio-demographic characteristics related to their Internet activities, and the relationship between academic performance and Internet activities. Overall, findings indicate that low-income children initially use the Internet primarily for entertainment. As home Internet use loses its novelty children become more focused in their Internet activities, reducing the number of websites they visit and visiting more websites targeted to their specific interests. Pornography websites are popular initially, especially among boys, but their popularity decreases dramatically after 3 months. Age, race, and sex have little influence on which websites are most popular. Academic performance predicts subsequent Internet activities, and Internet activities predict subsequent academic performance. Directions for future research to identify mechanisms that mediate the relationship between Internet activities and academic performance and implications for the digital divide are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cpb.2006.9970

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, L. A., Samona, R., Moomaw, J., Ramsay, L., Murray, C., Smith, A., & Murray, L.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2007-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
182-190
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W1978343313
Cited by
61
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
26.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
children's internet use, household internet use, low-income households, single-parent families, African American children, academic performance, entertainment use, digital divide, sociodemographic factors, longitudinal study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Black or African American, Child, Educational Status, Erotica, Female, Humans, Leisure Activities, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Michigan, Socioeconomic Factors, Utilization Review, Internet, Single-Parent Family, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review