Cited by 450ICT Impact and PoliciesInformation Society and Technology TrendsGender and Technology in Education

Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet

Hoffman, Donna L., Novak, Thomas P.·1998·Science

Abstract

We investigated differences in Internet use between whites and African Americans in the United States. Although African Americans are online in impressive numbers, significant disparities in access indicate the presence of a racial divide on the Internet. Our findings have important implications for public policy seeking to ensure Internet access for all members of our society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.280.5362.390

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lack of Black-oriented online content should be considered a serious impediment to Black participation.

    “Hoffman and Novak (1998), in their canonical work on the digital divide, noted that a lack of Black-oriented online content should be considered a serious impediment to Black participation.”

    From Distributed Blackness: African American Cybercultures (2020) · cites this paper as Hoffman and Novak (1998)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Science
Published
1998-04-17
Volume
280
Issue
5362
Pages
390-391
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1520745034
Cited by
450
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
112.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
internet use, racial disparities, African Americans, White Americans, digital divide, internet access, racial inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review