The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glucose Variability: A Review of Clinical Applications and Research Developments
Open accessAbstract
Glycemic variability (GV) is a major consideration when evaluating quality of glycemic control. GV increases progressively from prediabetes through advanced T2D and is still higher in T1D. GV is correlated with risk of hypoglycemia. The most popular metrics for GV are the %Coefficient of Variation (%CV) and standard deviation (SD). The %CV is correlated with risk of hypoglycemia. Graphical display of glucose by date, time of day, and day of the week, and display of simplified glucose distributions showing % of time in several ranges, provide clinically useful indicators of GV. SD is highly correlated with most other measures of GV, including interquartile range, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion, mean of daily differences, and average daily risk range. Some metrics are sensitive to the frequency, periodicity, and complexity of glycemic fluctuations, including Fourier analysis, periodograms, frequency spectrum, multiscale entropy (MSE), and Glucose Variability Percentage (GVP). Fourier analysis indicates progressive changes from normal subjects to children and adults with T1D, and from prediabetes to T2D. The GVP identifies novel characteristics for children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes and for adults with type 2. GVP also demonstrated small rapid glycemic fluctuations in people with T1D when using a dual-hormone closed-loop control. MSE demonstrated systematic changes from normal subjects to people with T2D at various stages of duration, intensity of therapy, and quality of glycemic control. We describe new metrics to characterize postprandial excursions, day-to-day stability of glucose patterns, and systematic changes of patterns by day of the week. Metrics for GV should be interpreted in terms of percentiles and z-scores relative to identified reference populations. There is a need for large accessible databases for reference populations to provide a basis for automated interpretation of GV and other features of continuous glucose monitoring records.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite its demonstrated value, clinical utilization of CGM data has remained suboptimal.”
From Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range (2019) · cites this paper as [74]
In the citing paper
“Although time constraints and reimbursement issues are clearly obstacles, clinician inexperience in data interpretation and lack of standardization software for visualization of CGM data have also played a role (74) .”
From Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range (2019) · cites this paper as [74]
Citations
Cites
Multiscale Entropy Analysis of Complex Physiologic Time Series
Costa, M., Goldberger, A. L., & Peng, C.-K. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.068102 · Cited by 3,207
International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring
Danne, T., Nimri, R., Battelino, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Close, K. L., DeVries, J. H., Garg, S., Heinemann, L., Hirsch, I., Amiel, S. A., et al. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-1600 · Cited by 2,069
Glucose variability is associated with intensive care unit mortality*
Hermanides, J., Vriesendorp, T. M., Bosman, R. J., Zandstra, D. F., Hoekstra, J. B. L., & DeVries, J. H. (2010) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181cc4be9 · Cited by 446
Glucose Variability; Does It Matter?
Siegelaar, S. E., Holleman, F., Hoekstra, J. B. L., & DeVries, J. H. (2010) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0021 · Cited by 409
Toward Defining the Threshold Between Low and High Glucose Variability in Diabetes
Monnier, L., Colette, C., Wojtusciszyn, A., Dejager, S., Renard, E., Molinari, N., & Owens, D. R. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-1769 · Cited by 390
Rodbard, D. (2009) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2008.0132 · Cited by 324
Self-citationBergenstal, R. M., Ahmann, A. J., Bailey, T., Beck, R. W., Bissen, J., Buckingham, B., Deeb, L., Dolin, R. H., Garg, S. K., Goland, R., et al. (2013) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0051 · Cited by 307
Glucose Variability: Timing, Risk Analysis, and Relationship to Hypoglycemia in Diabetes
Kovatchev, B. P., & Cobelli, C. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-2035 · Cited by 276
Symmetrization of the Blood Glucose Measurement Scale and Its Applications
Kovatchev, B. P., Cox, D. J., Gonder-Frederick, L. A., & Clarke, W. L. (1997) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.20.11.1655 · Cited by 258
Statistical Tools to Analyze Continuous Glucose Monitor Data
Clarke, W. L., & Kovatchev, B. P. (2009) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2008.0138 · Cited by 248
Glucose Variability: Where It Is Important and How to Measure It
DeVries, J. H. (2013) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db12-1610 · Cited by 236
New and Improved Methods to Characterize Glycemic Variability Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Rodbard, D. (2009) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2009.0015 · Cited by 235
Self-citationService, F. J. (2013) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db12-1396 · Cited by 228
Minimizing Hypoglycemia in Diabetes
International Hypoglycaemia Study Group (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-0279 · Cited by 218
Outcome measures for artificial pancreas clinical trials: a consensus report
Maahs, D. M., Buckingham, B. A., Castle, J. R., Cinar, A., Damiano, E. R., Dassau, E., DeVries, J. H., Doyle, F. J., Griffen, S. C., Haidar, A., et al. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-2716 · Cited by 211
Fonseca, V. A., Grunberger, G., Anhalt, H., Bailey, T. S., Blevins, T., Garg, S. K., Handelsman, Y., Hirsch, I. B., Orzeck, E. A., Roberts, V. L., et al. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161392.cs · Cited by 195
Mazze, R. S., Strock, E. S., Wesley, D., Borgman, S. K., Morgan, B., Bergenstal, R. M., & Cuddihy, R. M. (2008) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2007.0293 · Cited by 184
Ambulatory Glucose Profile: Representation of Verified Self-Monitored Blood Glucose Data
Mazze, R. S., Lucido, D., Langer, O., Hartmann, K., & Rodbard, D. (1987) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.10.1.111 · Cited by 144
Self-citationMuggeo, M., Verlato, G., Bonora, E., Zoppini, G., Corbellini, M., & de Marco, R. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1750 · Cited by 142
Measurements of Glucose Control
Service, F. J., O’Brien, P. C., & Rizza, R. A. (1987) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.10.2.225 · Cited by 140
A method for assessing quality of control from glucose profiles
Hill, N. R., Hindmarsh, P. C., Stevens, R., STRATTON, I. M., Lévy, J., & Matthews, D. R. (2007) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02119.x · Cited by 134
Optimal sampling intervals to assess long-term glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring
Xing, D., Kollman, C., Beck, R. W., Tamborlane, W. V., Laffel, L., Buckingham, B. A., Wilson, D. M., Weinzimer, S., Fiallo-Scharer, R., & Ruedy for the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuo, K. J. (2011) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2010.0156 · Cited by 131
Bailey, T. S., Grunberger, G., Bode, B. W., Handelsman, Y., Hirsch, I. B., Jovanovič, L., Roberts, V. L., Rodbard, D., Tamborlane, W. V., & Walsh, J. S. A. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep151124.cs · Cited by 130
Self-citationClinical Interpretation of Indices of Quality of Glycemic Control and Glycemic Variability
Rodbard, D. (2011) · Postgraduate Medicine · doi:10.3810/pgm.2011.07.2310 · Cited by 127
Self-citationQu, Y., Jacober, S. J., Zhang, Q., Wolka, L. L., & DeVries, J. H. (2012) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2012.0099 · Cited by 126
Rama Chandran, S., Tay, W. L., Lye, W. K., Lim, L. L., Ratnasingam, J., Tan, A. T. B., & S.L. Gardner, D. (2018) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2017.0388 · Cited by 114
Baghurst, P. (2011) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2010.0090 · Cited by 110
Peyser, T. A., Balo, A. K., Buckingham, B. A., Hirsch, I. B., & Garcia, A. (2017) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2017.0187 · Cited by 90
Rodbard, D. (2012) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2012.0062 · Cited by 88
Self-citationPolonsky, W. H., Fisher, L., Schikman, C. H., Hinnen, D. A., Parkin, C. G., Jelsovsky, Z., Axel-Schweitzer, M., Petersen, B., & Wagner, R. S. (2011) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2011.0073 · Cited by 85
El-Laboudi, A. H., Godsland, I. F., Johnston, D. G., & Oliver, N. S. (2016) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2016.0146 · Cited by 83
Bode, B. W., Johnson, J. A., Hyveled, L., Tamer, S. C., & Demissie, M. (2017) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2016.0350 · Cited by 72
Characterizing Blood Glucose Variability Using New Metrics with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data
Marling, C. R., Shubrook, J. H., Vernier, S. J., Wiley, M. T., & Schwartz, F. (2011) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681100500408 · Cited by 71
Dynamical glucometry: Use of multiscale entropy analysis in diabetes
Costa, M. D., Henriques, T. S., Munshi, M. N., Segal, A. R., & Goldberger, A. L. (2014) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.4894537 · Cited by 67
Pernick, N. L., & Rodbard, D. (1986) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.9.1.61 · Cited by 65
Self-citationRodbard, D. (2018) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2017.0416 · Cited by 58
Self-citationAugstein, P., Heinke, P., Vogt, L., Vogt, R., Rackow, C., Kohnert, K., & Salzsieder, E. (2015) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-015-0019-0 · Cited by 51
Fabris, C., Facchinetti, A., Sparacino, G., Zanon, M., Guerra, S., Maran, A., & Cobelli, C. (2014) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0252 · Cited by 48
Display of Glucose Distributions by Date, Time of Day, and Day of Week: New and Improved Methods
Rodbard, D. (2009) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229680900300619 · Cited by 47
Self-citationKohnert, K., Heinke, P., Fritzsche, G., Vogt, L., Augstein, P., & Salzsieder, E. (2013) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2012.0303 · Cited by 47
Baghurst, P., Rodbard, D., & Cameron, F. (2010) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681000400612 · Cited by 46
Self-citationHirsch, I. B., Balo, A. K., Sayer, K., Garcia, A., Buckingham, B. A., & Peyser, T. A. (2017) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2017.0080 · Cited by 41
Fabris, C., Facchinetti, A., Fico, G., Sambo, F., Arredondo, M. T., & Cobelli, C. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296815596173 · Cited by 37
Chen, J., Chen, P.-F., & Wang, H. (2014) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00108.2014 · Cited by 33
Miller, M., & Strange, P. (2007) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229680700100506 · Cited by 29
A Consensus Perceived Glycemic Variability Metric
Marling, C. R., Struble, N., Bunescu, R., Shubrook, J. H., & Schwartz, F. (2013) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681300700409 · Cited by 28
Mori, Y., Taniguchi, Y., Matsuura, K., Sezaki, K., Yokoyama, J., & Utsunomiya, K. (2011) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2011.0025 · Cited by 27
A Semilogarithmic Scale for Glucose Provides a Balanced View of Hyperglycemia and Hypoglycemia
Rodbard, D. (2009) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229680900300620 · Cited by 26
Self-citationMazze, R., Strock, E. S., Morgan, B., Wesley, D., Bergenstal, R. M., & Cuddihy, R. M. (2009) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep09046.orr · Cited by 25
Fico, G., Hernández, L., Cancela, J., Isabel, M., Facchinetti, A., Fabris, C., Gabriel, R., Cobelli, C., & Arredondo, M. T. (2017) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296816685717 · Cited by 22
Crenier, L. (2013) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0241 · Cited by 22
Yet Another Glucose Variability Index: Time for a Paradigm Change?
Cobelli, C., & Facchinetti, A. (2018) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2017.0397 · Cited by 20
Poor Agreement of Computerized Calculators for Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions
Sechterberger, M. K., Luijf, Y. M., & DeVries, J. H. (2013) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0138 · Cited by 19
van Dijk, P. R., Groenier, K. H., DeVries, J. H., Gans, R. O. B., Kleefstra, N., Bilo, H. J. G., & Logtenberg, S. J. J. (2015) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2015.0001 · Cited by 19
Decreased complexity of glucose dynamics preceding the onset of diabetes in mice and rats
Zhang, X. D., Pechter, D., Yang, L. M., Ping, X., Yao, Z., Zhang, R., Shen, X., Li, N. X., Connick, J. H., Nawrocki, A. R., et al. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182810 · Cited by 18
Henriques, T. S., Munshi, M. N., Segal, A. R., Costa, M. D., & Goldberger, A. L. (2014) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296814524095 · Cited by 16
Standardization Versus Customization of Glucose Reporting
Rodbard, D. (2013) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2013.0116 · Cited by 15
Self-citationNew Approaches to Display of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Data
Rodbard, D. (2009) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229680900300515 · Cited by 13
Self-citationFonseca, V. A., & Grunberger, G. (2017) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/1934-2403-23.5.629 · Cited by 12
Garcia, A., Balo, A. K., Buckingham, B. A., Hirsch, I. B., & Peyser, T. A. (2017) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2017.0188 · Cited by 8
Kohnert, K. (2017) · International Journal of Diabetes and Clinical Research · doi:10.23937/2377-3634/1410071 · Cited by 4
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Cameron FJ, , Baghurst PA, , Rodbard D: Assessing glycemic variation: why, when and how?. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev, 2010; 7 Suppl 3:432–444.
- Strange P, , Shi L, , Miller MF: Glucose Energy Spectrum as a function of dysglycemia progression. Abstract/Poster 268. European Association for the Study of Diabetes, Annual Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal September 2017. Diabetologia, 60(Suppl 1):S126.
- Gómez AM Muñoz OM Marin A et al.: Different indexes of glycemic variability as identifiers of patients with risk of hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2018; 1–9. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1932296818758105. · DOI
- Rodbard D: Potential role of computers in clinical investigation and management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 1988; 11 Suppl 1:54–61.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Battelino, T., Danne, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Amiel, S. A., Beck, R., Biester, T., Bosi, E., Buckingham, B. A., Cefalu, W. T., Close, K. L., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci19-0028 · Cited by 4,237
Self-citationGlucose‐Sensitive Hydrogel Optical Fibers Functionalized with Phenylboronic Acid
Yetisen, A. K., Jiang, N., Fallahi, A., Montelongo, Y., Ruiz‐Esparza, G. U., Tamayol, A., Zhang, Y. S., Mahmood, I., Yang, S., Kim, K. S., et al. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201606380 · Cited by 311
Review of methods for detecting glycemic disorders
Bergman, M., Abdul‐Ghani, M. A., DeFronzo, R. A., Manco, M., Sesti, G., Fiorentino, T. V., Ceriello, A., Rhee, M. K., Phillips, L. S., Chung, S. T., et al. (2020) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108233 · Cited by 210
Ribet, F., Stemme, G., & Roxhed, N. (2018) · Biomedical Microdevices · doi:10.1007/s10544-018-0349-6 · Cited by 184
Glucose Variability: How Does It Work?
Klimontov, V. V., Saik, O., & Korbut, A. I. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22157783 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodbard, D.
- Affiliations
- Biomedical Informatics Consultants LLC
- Corresponding author
- Rodbard, David
- ORCID
- Rodbard, David
- Venue
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2_suppl
- Pages
- S25-S215
- ISSN
- 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8593
- OpenAlex
- W2809144128
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- glycemic variability, coefficient of variation, standard deviation, hypoglycemia risk, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, multiscale entropy, Fourier analysis, artificial pancreas, continuous glucose monitoring, glycemic control, postprandial glucose excursions, reference population
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Research, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review