Cited by 26

Skin Problems Due to Treatment with Technology Are Associated with Increased Disease Burden Among Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Christensen, Maria O., Berg, Anna K., Rytter, Karen, Hommel, Eva, Thyssen, Jacob P., Svensson, Jannet, Nørgaard, Kirsten·2019·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background: In a 4-month follow-up survey, we examined whether treatment with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and/or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults with type 1 diabetes was associated with sustained skin problems and whether skin problems were associated with diabetes-related emotional distress. Research Design and Methods: A total of 111 adult patients completed a follow-up questionnaire concerning skin problems as a result of CSII and/or CGM use. The questionnaire included a patient-reported outcome measure, the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale. Results: Current visible skin problems caused by CSII or CGM use were reported by 51 (46.0%) participants, in 34 (66.7%) of whom skin problems had been reported more than 4 months earlier. Seventy-two (64.9%) participants reported skin problems as a result of CSII use, whereas 38 (74.5%) reported skin problems owing to CGM use at some time. Itching was the most prevalent complaint. CSII-related itching was associated with a mean PAID score >20 ( P = 0.01), and patients with more than one skin problem had an increased PAID score compared with those with one or no skin problems ( P = 0.006). Conclusions: More than half patients treated with CSII, CGM, or both had experienced skin problems during 4 months of follow-up that were associated with increased diabetes burden. Skin problems represent a persistent health issue affecting diabetes-specific emotional distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2019.0007

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For users of both CSII and CGM technologies, the combined application and intervals of device change can be burdensome because of numerous adhesive patch removals and increased risk of skin irritation, skin reactions, or adhesive tape allergies, with minimal days for recovery.

    “Thus, for users of both CSII and CGM technologies, the combined application and intervals of device change can be burdensome because of numerous adhesive patch removals and increased risk of skin irritation,5,6 skin reactions,5,6 or adhesive tape allergies,7 with minimal days for recovery.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, M. O., Berg, A. K., Rytter, K., Hommel, E., Thyssen, J. P., Svensson, J., & Nørgaard, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
  • Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2019-03-30
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
215-221
ISSN
  • 1520-9156
  • 1557-8593
Cited by
26
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review