Skin Problems Due to Treatment with Technology Are Associated with Increased Disease Burden Among Adults with Type 1 Diabetes
Abstract
Background: In a 4-month follow-up survey, we examined whether treatment with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and/or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults with type 1 diabetes was associated with sustained skin problems and whether skin problems were associated with diabetes-related emotional distress. Research Design and Methods: A total of 111 adult patients completed a follow-up questionnaire concerning skin problems as a result of CSII and/or CGM use. The questionnaire included a patient-reported outcome measure, the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale. Results: Current visible skin problems caused by CSII or CGM use were reported by 51 (46.0%) participants, in 34 (66.7%) of whom skin problems had been reported more than 4 months earlier. Seventy-two (64.9%) participants reported skin problems as a result of CSII use, whereas 38 (74.5%) reported skin problems owing to CGM use at some time. Itching was the most prevalent complaint. CSII-related itching was associated with a mean PAID score >20 ( P = 0.01), and patients with more than one skin problem had an increased PAID score compared with those with one or no skin problems ( P = 0.006). Conclusions: More than half patients treated with CSII, CGM, or both had experienced skin problems during 4 months of follow-up that were associated with increased diabetes burden. Skin problems represent a persistent health issue affecting diabetes-specific emotional distress.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For users of both CSII and CGM technologies, the combined application and intervals of device change can be burdensome because of numerous adhesive patch removals and increased risk of skin irritation, skin reactions, or adhesive tape allergies, with minimal days for recovery.
“Thus, for users of both CSII and CGM technologies, the combined application and intervals of device change can be burdensome because of numerous adhesive patch removals and increased risk of skin irritation,5,6 skin reactions,5,6 or adhesive tape allergies,7 with minimal days for recovery.”
From Evaluation of Extended Infusion Set Performance in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Infusion Set Survival Rate and Glycemic Outcomes from a Pivotal Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
The problem areas in diabetes scale: an evaluation of its clinical utility
Welch, G. W., Jacobson, A. M., & Polonsky, W. H. (1997) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.20.5.760 · Cited by 664 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Validity has been demonstrated in other countries and languages, 25,27,32,33 and the PAID scale has been translated and used in several other Danish studies.”
Safety of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in patients with type 1 diabetes
Bergenstal, R. M., Garg, S., Weinzimer, S. A., Buckingham, B. A., Bode, B. W., Tamborlane, W. V., & Kaufman, F. R. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.11708 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
the SWITCH Study Group, Battelino, T., Conget, I., Olsen, B., Schütz-Fuhrmann, I., Hommel, E., Hoogma, R., Schierloh, U., Sulli, N., & Bolinder, J. (2012) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2708-9 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Self-citationKarges, B., Schwandt, A., Heidtmann, B., Kordonouri, O., Binder, E., Schierloh, U., Boettcher, C., Kapellen, T., Rosenbauer, J., & Holl, R. W. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.13994 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Charleer, S., Mathieu, C., Nobels, F., De Block, C., Radermecker, R. P., Hermans, M. P., Taes, Y., Vercammen, C., T'Sjoen, G., Crenier, L., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2017-02498 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections
Foster, N. C., Miller, K. M., Tamborlane, W. V., Bergenstal, R. M., & Beck, R. W. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-0207 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benefits and limitations of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
Stone, J. Y., & Bailey, T. S. (2020) · Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1080/17446651.2020.1706482 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Brazg, R., Garg, S. K., Bhargava, A., Thrasher, J. R., Latif, K., Bode, B. W., Bailey, T. S., Horowitz, B. S., Cavale, A., Kudva, Y. C., et al. (2022) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2021.0540 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Christensen, M. O., Berg, A. K., Rytter, K., Hommel, E., Thyssen, J. P., Svensson, J., & Nørgaard, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
- Venue
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-03-30
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 215-221
- ISSN
- 1520-9156
- 1557-8593
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review