Cited by 76Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections

Open access
Foster, Nicole C., Miller, Kellee M., Tamborlane, William V., Bergenstal, Richard M., Beck, Roy W.·2016·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been demonstrated in randomized trials to improve glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) (1–3); however, most of the participants in these trials have used a pump for insulin delivery, and the use of CGM in T1D patients receiving insulin by injection has not been well studied. We used the T1D Exchange registry database to assess the impact of CGM on HbA1c in insulin injection users. Details on the informed consent process, eligibility criteria, and data collection methods have been previously published (4). Participants were defined as CGM users if CGM was used for real-time diabetes management during the 30 days prior to the clinic visit. Among the 17,731 registry participants with T1D duration >1 year who had a clinic visit between June 2014 and October 2015, 6,222 (35%) used injections alone, 8,783 (50%) used pump alone, 2,316 (13%) used pump with CGM, and 410 (2%) used injections with CGM. A Dexcom CGM was being used by …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc16-0207

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, N. C., Miller, K. M., Tamborlane, W. V., Bergenstal, R. M., & Beck, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Park Nicollet Health Services (US)
Corresponding author
Foster, Nicole C.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2016-04-19
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
e81-e82
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2340589304
Cited by
76
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Amylin Pharmaceuticals
  • Sanofi
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  • Intarcia Therapeutics
  • MannKind Corporation
  • Halozyme
  • Dexcom
  • ResMed
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • Novo Nordisk
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Abbott Diabetes Care
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK045735)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, type 1 diabetes, insulin injection, insulin pump therapy, glycemic control, HbA1c, diabetes management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review