Cited by 27Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

The Canadian LMC Diabetes Registry: A Profile of the Demographics, Management, and Outcomes of Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Aronson, Ronnie, Brown, Ruth E., Abitbol, Alexander, Goldenberg, Ronald, Yared, Zeina, Ajala, Buki, Yale, Jean-Francois·2021·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Objective: Clinical guidelines now define the standard of diabetes care, but few health care jurisdictions systematically assess their practicality and impact. The Canadian LMC Diabetes Registry includes the electronic health records of >50 endocrinologists in three provinces and provides quarterly real-time outcome reports to each endocrinologist. This retrospective cohort study aimed to characterize the demographics, treatment regimens, and outcomes of the type 1 diabetes (T1D) patient population in the registry. Research Design and Methods: Adults were included if they had a clinical diagnosis of T1D, had seen an LMC endocrinologist between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2018, and had follow-up >6 months. This study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04162067). Results: The resulting cohort included 3600 individuals with mean age of 43.9 ± 15.3 years and duration of diabetes of 21.5 ± 13.9 years. Mean hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) was 8.1% ± 1.5% and only 22.5% had achieved HbA1c ≤7.0%. In each measure, individuals in younger cohorts showed poorer glycemic control than older cohorts. Within each age cohort, insulin pump users showed a lower mean HbA1c than those using multiple daily injections, especially in cohorts who were also not using a continuous glucose monitor. Overall, 63.1% reported at least weekly hypoglycemia, whereas 3.6% reported severe hypoglycemia ≥1 per year. Conclusions: Despite receiving care in an advanced well-resourced environment, within a public health car…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2020.0204

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aronson, R., Brown, R. E., Abitbol, A., Goldenberg, R., Yared, Z., Ajala, B., & Yale, J.-F.
Affiliations
  • LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology (Canada) (CA)
  • LMC Diabetes and Endocrinology, Toronto, Canada.
Corresponding author
Aronson, Ronnie
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2020-12-31
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
31-40
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W3042558568
Cited by
27
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, diabetes management, glycemic control, HbA1c, insulin pump therapy, multiple daily insulin injections, continuous glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, endocrinology practice, electronic health records, clinical practice guideline adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Canada, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Middle Aged, Registries, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review