The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural Sound Facilitates Mood Recovery
Abstract
Visual exposure to natural scenes can aid in recovery from stress, attentional fatigue, and physical ailments including surgery and sickness. Yet little is known about what role auditory stimuli may play in restorative processes. The current study extends prior work on the benefit of natural visual scenes to the domain of natural auditory exposure. Undergraduate students (N=133) were exposed to an unsettling video and reliably reported worsened affective state on the Brief Mood Introspection Scale (BMIS) immediately following the stimuli. Participants were then randomly assigned to either a natural sounds condition or to a comparison condition that was natural sounds intermingled with anthropogenic sounds (human voices or motorized vehicles). Participants exposed to a brief period of natural sounds following the video showed greater mood recovery, as measured by the BMIS, than did those exposed to the same stimuli also containing human-caused sounds (voices or motorized vehicles). Thus natural so...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“listening to natural sounds was shown to be more restorative than anthropogenic sounds (Benfield et al., 2014)”
From Exploring the role of exposure to green and blue spaces in preventing anxiety and depression among young people aged 14–24 years living in urban settings: A systematic review and conceptual framework (2022) · cites this paper as Benfield et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“The natural sound condition showed greater recovery from the upsetting video compared to both the control and anthropogenic sound conditions.”
From Exploring the role of exposure to green and blue spaces in preventing anxiety and depression among young people aged 14–24 years living in urban settings: A systematic review and conceptual framework (2022) · cites this paper as Benfield et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Significant BMIS change by sound condition was shown for Pleasant-Unpleasant sub-scale (F = 7.62, p < 0.001, partial η2 = .150)and Positive-Tired subscale (F = 6.36, p < 0.001, partial η2 = .126)”
From Exploring the role of exposure to green and blue spaces in preventing anxiety and depression among young people aged 14–24 years living in urban settings: A systematic review and conceptual framework (2022) · cites this paper as Benfield et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“The impacts of different components of nature can be broken down, and such studies provide evidence of the restorative qualities of viewing or listening to nature, with associated improvements in mood and relaxation (Benfield et al., 2014;Tedja and Tsaih, 2015;Chang et al., 2008;Chan KLE, 2015).”
From Exploring the role of exposure to green and blue spaces in preventing anxiety and depression among young people aged 14–24 years living in urban settings: A systematic review and conceptual framework (2022) · cites this paper as Benfield et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature.
Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x · Cited by 2,535
Effect of psychological stress on the salivary cortisol and amylase levels in healthy young adults
Takai, N., Yamaguchi, M., Aragaki, T., Eto, K., Uchihashi, K., & Nishikawa, Y. (2004) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.06.007 · Cited by 568 · cited 1×
“1 Following baseline measurement, all participants were exposed to a presumptively stress-inducing video similar to that utilized in prior research (Bosch et al., 2001; Takai et al., 2004).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1177/0013916509351219 · DOI
- Benfield J. A., , Rainbolt G. A., , Bell P. A., , & Donovan G. (2014). Classrooms with nature views: Evidence of differing student perceptions and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, doi:10.1177/0013916513499583. · DOI
- 10.1111/1469-8986.3850836 · DOI
- 10.1177/0013916503255102 · DOI
- Driver B. L., , Nash R., , & Haas G. (1987). Wilderness benefits: A state-of-knowledge view. In Lucas R. C. (Ed.), Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Issues, state of knowledge, future directions (Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-220, pp. 294–319). Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service.
- 10.1145/985921.986135 · DOI
- Haas G. E., , & Wakefield T. J. (1998). National parks and the American public: A national public opinion survey on the National Park System: A summary report. (conducted by Colorado State University). Washington, DC: The Association.
- 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Heerwagen J. H. (1990). The psychological aspect of windows and window design. In Anthony K. H., , Choi J., & Orland B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, EDRA 21/1990 (pp. 269–280). Oklahoma City, OK: EDRA.
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.002 · DOI
- Jensen M., , & Thompson H. (2004). Natural sounds: An endangered species. The George Wright Forum, 21, 10–13.
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/0169-2046(93)90016-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00110-X · DOI
- 10.1080/089419299279713 · DOI
- 10.1080/01490400.2011.550224 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.102 · DOI
- 10.2190/KM50-WH2K-K2D1-DM69 · DOI
- 10.1006/jevp.1998.0086 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.2935525 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.11.005 · DOI
- Rainbolt G. N., , Benfield J. A., , & Bell P. A. (2012). The influence of anthropogenic sound in historical parks: Implications for park management. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 30, 53–65.
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.004 · DOI
- 10.1080/02827580701262733 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jevp.2001.0241 · DOI
- 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90016-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.6143402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1080/01490400.2014.888022 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soga, M., Evans, M. J., Tsuchiya, K., & Fukano, Y. (2021) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2248 · Cited by 389
Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas
Buxton, R. T., McKenna, M. F., Mennitt, D. J., Fristrup, K. M., Crooks, K. R., Angeloni, L. M., & Wittemyer, G. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah4783 · Cited by 325
Sound and Soundscape in Restorative Natural Environments: A Narrative Literature Review
Ratcliffe, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570563 · Cited by 281
“In a laboratory experiment, Benfield et al. (2014) exposed participants to a stress- and negative affect-inducing video and then to one of four conditions: natural sounds (birdsong and rustling leaves); natural sounds plus traffic; natural sounds plus voices; or a control condition with no audio present.”
BackgroundAletta, F., Oberman, T., & Jian, K. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15112392 · Cited by 228
The affective benefits of nature exposure
Bratman, G. N., Olvera‐Alvarez, H. A., & Gross, J. J. (2021) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12630 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Benfield, J. A., Taff, B. D., Newman, P., & Smyth, J.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University Park
- ORCID
- Smyth, Joshua
- Venue
- Ecopsychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 183-188
- ISSN
- 1942-9347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1183829673
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecopsychology (publishedVersion)
- Ecopsychology
- Funders
- National Park Service
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Noise Effects and Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
- Keywords
- natural sounds, mood recovery, auditory stimuli, restorative environments, anthropogenic noise, stress recovery, affective states, nature exposure, attentional fatigue
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
