Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antimicrobial effects of pepper, parsley, and dill and their roles in the microbiological quality enhancement of traditional Egyptian Kareish cheese.

Wahba, Nahed M., Ahmed, Amany S., Ebraheim, Zedan Z.·2010·Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
DOI 10.1089/fpd.2009.0412
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study was designed to assess the application of some edible plants including cayenne, green pepper, parsley, and dill to Kareish cheese and to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of these plant materials against natural microflora, coliforms, molds, and Staphylococcus aureus. Twelve different concentrations of ethanol extract of the plants were prepared for determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration. Cayenne and green pepper extracts showed highest activity followed by dill and parsley against S. aureus. Addition of cayenne or green pepper to Kareish cheese during manufacture revealed that both plants were able reduce the S. aureus population to undetectable level within the first and second days of storage. To study the effect of combining plant materials on the microbiological quality of ready-to-eat Kareish cheese, the total bacterial count, coliform count, and yeast and molds counts were determined. It has been found that addition of plant materials to Kareish cheese reduced the total bacterial and coliform populations. All concentrations of cayenne, green pepper, dill, and parsley (9%) completely reduced the yeast count within 2 hours. Cayenne and green pepper completely reduced the mold count within 2 days, whereas parsley and dill were found to be less effective. Kareish cheese prepared with 1% cayenne pepper and 3% and 6% each of green pepper, dill, and parsley were found strongly acceptable to the consumer and considered the most preferable type. Ther…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/fpd.2009.0412

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Abd-alla MS, 2000, Ann Agric Sci, 45, 409
  2. Adams MS, 2000, Food Microbiology, 10.1039/9781847550880 · DOI
  3. 10.1079/BJN20061788 · DOI
  4. Aman IM, 1994, Assiut Vet Med J, 31, 182
  5. Amer AA, 2003, Kafr El-Sheikh Vet Med J, 1, 837
  6. 10.1080/03601230802599118 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/03601230600857114 · DOI
  8. [APHA] American Public Health Association, 1992, Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological examination of Foods
  9. 10.4315/0362-028X-66.4.668 · DOI
  10. 10.1086/420058 · DOI
  11. Blumenthal M, 1998, The Complete German Commission E Monographs: Therapeutic Guide to Herbal Medicines
  12. 10.1002/ptr.1598 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.4315/0362-028X-63.10.1359 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00734-6 · DOI
  16. El Astal ZY, 2003, West Afr J Pharmacol Drug Res, 19, 16
  17. El Bagoury ANM, 2002, Minufia Vet J, 2, 59
  18. 10.4315/0362-028X-64.7.1019 · DOI · Paper page
  19. El-Kholy AM, 1995, BeniSuef Vet Med Res, 7, 342
  20. 10.4315/0362-028X-58.5.547 · DOI
  21. [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization, 1992, Manual of Food Quality Control, 4 Rev. 1, Microbiological Analysis
  22. Frazier WC, 1983, Food Microbiology
  23. Gunasekaran S, 2008, Egypt J Biomed Sci, 23, 73
  24. 10.4315/0362-028X-71.9.1846 · DOI
  25. 10.4315/0362-028X-67.12.2820 · DOI
  26. Harrigan WF, 1976, Laboratory Methods in Food and Dairy Microbiology
  27. Hosseinzadeh H, 2002, BMC Pharmacol, 2, 2210
  28. 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.03.007 · DOI
  29. Ibraheim ZZ, 2002, 2002 Assiut University Third Pharmaceutical Science Conference, 97
  30. 10.1021/jf801154r · DOI
  31. 10.1097/00042737-199612000-00018 · DOI
  32. 10.2174/0929867033457719 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/jf0516538 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00408-1 · DOI
  35. 10.1078/0944-7113-00058 · DOI
  36. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01428.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00153.x · DOI
  38. 10.1021/jf050709v · DOI
  39. 10.4315/0362-028X-60.1.72 · DOI
  40. 10.12681/jhvms.15267 · DOI
  41. Nelson JA, 1981, Judging Dairy Products
  42. 10.4315/0362-028X-67.1.199 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00343-3 · DOI
  44. 10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7499 · DOI
  45. Popović M, 2007, Phytother Res, 2, 17397132
  46. Quinn PJ, Carter MS, Markyl B, and Carter JR. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, Vol. 1. London: Mosby–Year Book Europe Limited, 1994, p. 118.
  47. 10.1111/j.1745-4565.1984.tb00479.x · DOI
  48. 10.1159/000098246 · DOI
  49. Reynolds JEF, 1996, Martindale—The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 31
  50. 10.1186/1472-6882-6-2 · DOI
  51. 10.1080/J157v04n02_01 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.03.003 · DOI
  53. Shehata AE, 1984, Egypt J Dairy Sci, 12, 47
  54. 10.1111/j.1745-4565.1984.tb00477.x · DOI
  55. 10.1002/ptr.951 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.fitote.2004.04.007 · DOI
  57. 10.1211/jpp.60.4.0010 · DOI
  58. 10.1271/bbb1961.52.1409 · DOI
  59. Ultee A, 1999, Appl Environ Microbiol, 655, 4606, 10.1128/AEM.65.10.4606-4610.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.031 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.jep.2007.07.023 · DOI
  62. Yazdanparast R, 2001, Cytobios, 105, 185

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wahba, N. M., Ahmed, A. S., & Ebraheim, Z. Z.
Affiliations
  • Animal Health Research Institute, Assiut Regional Laboratory, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
  • Department of Pharmacognacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Venue
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2010-04
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
411-418
ISSN
  • 1535-3141
  • 1556-7125
DOI
10.1089/fpd.2009.0412
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.liebertpub.com/nv/resources-tools/text-and-data-mining-policy/121/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.