Cited by 25Virus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Quantification of Adeno-Associated Virus with Safe Nucleic Acid Dyes

Open access
Xu, Jian, DeVries, Steven H., Zhu, Yongling·2020·Human Gene Therapy

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is the most commonly used viral vector for both biological and gene therapeutic applications. Although many methods have been developed to measure quantity attributes of AAV, they are often technically challenging and time-consuming. Here, we report a method to titer AAV with GelGreen ® dye, a safe green fluorescence nucleic acid dye recently engineered by Biotium company (Fremont, CA). This method, hereinafter referred to as GelGreen method, provides a fast (∼30 min) and reliable strategy for AAV titration. To validate GelGreen method, we measured genome titer of an AAV reference material AAV8RSM and compared our titration results with those determined by Reference Material Working Group (ARMWG). We showed that GelGreen results and capsid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results are comparable with each other. We also showed that GelRed ® dye, a red fluorescence dye from Biotium, can be used to directly “visualize” AAV genome titer on a conventional gel imager, presenting an especially direct approach to estimate viral quantity. Finally, we showed that GelGreen and GelRed dyes can also be used to quantify self-complementary AAV (scAAV) and crudely purified AAV samples. In summary, we described a technique to titer AAV by using new generation of safe DNA dyes. This technique is simple, safe, reliable, and cost efficient. It has potential to be broadly applied for quantifying and normalizing AAV viral vectors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/hum.2020.063

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, J., DeVries, S. H., & Zhu, Y.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhu, Yongling
Venue
Human Gene Therapy
Published
2020-10
Volume
31
Issue
19-20
Pages
1086-1099
ISSN
  • 1043-0342 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7422
OpenAlex
W3021961135
Cited by
25
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Northwestern University
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY018204, R01EY030169)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
adeno-associated virus, self-complementary AAV
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, DNA, Viral, Fluorescent Dyes, Genetic Vectors, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review