Cited by 41Ocular Surface and Contact LensAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity

Ocular distribution of cyclosporine following topical administration of OTX-101 in New Zealand white rabbits

Open access
Weiss, Sidney L., Kramer, William G.·2019·Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Evaluate the ocular distribution, tolerability, and systemic exposure of cyclosporine (CsA) in New Zealand white rabbits following topical administration of OTX-101, a novel, clear aqueous nanomicellar solution developed for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED). Methods: The study design included single- and repeat-dose phases. In the single-dose phase, rabbits received a single instillation of OTX-101 0.05% or CsA ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis ® ; Allergan, Irvine, CA) as a comparator. In the repeat-dosing phase, OTX-101 (0.01%, 0.05%, or 0.1% CsA) or comparator was instilled 4 times per day for 7 days. Samples collected included whole blood, tears, and ocular tissues/fluids (aqueous humor, choroid-retina, conjunctiva, cornea, superior eyelid, third eyelid, iris/ciliary body, lacrimal gland, lens, sclera, and vitreous humor). CsA concentrations were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: Analysis included samples from 112 rabbits. The highest concentration of CsA following a single OTX-101 0.05% instillation occurred in the third eyelid (C max = 1,200 ng/g). Concentrations of CsA in the cornea and superior bulbar conjunctiva increased in a dose-related manner following repeated administration of OTX-101 formulations; C max [T max (h)] for cornea was 1,543 ng/g (6.50), 5,410 ng/g (7.0), and 8,123 ng/g (6.50), for 0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.1% CsA concentrations, respectively; for superior bulbar conjunctiva was 726 ng/g (6.50), 1,468 ng/g (6.50), and 2,080 ng/g (6.25), respectively. Conclusions: OTX-101 topical ophthalmic instillation resulted in extensive distribution of CsA in ocular tissues, particularly in target tissues for DED (cornea and conjunctiva), while systemic exposure was negligible.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jop.2018.0106

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiss, S. L., & Kramer, W. G.
Affiliations
  • Auven Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • Kramer Consulting LLC, North Potomac, Maryland.
Corresponding author
Weiss, Sidney L.
Venue
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Published
2019-09-01
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
395-402
ISSN
  • 1080-7683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7732
OpenAlex
W2915293434
Cited by
41
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Keywords
cyclosporine, dry eye, ocular drug distribution, topical ocular administration, cornea, conjunctiva, third eyelid, aqueous humor, vitreous humor, lacrimal gland, systemic exposure, tolerability, rabbits, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromatography, Liquid, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Eye, Female, Immunosuppressive Agents, Micelles, Rabbits, Tissue Distribution, Cyclosporine, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Nanoparticles, Administration, Ophthalmic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review