Cited by 285Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Positive and Negative Religious Coping and Well-Being in Women with Breast Cancer

Open access
Hebert, Randy, Zdaniuk, Bozena, Schulz, Richard, Scheier, Michael·2009·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although religions is important to many people with cancer, few studies have explored the relationship between religious coping and well-being in a prospective manner, using validated measures, while controlling for important covariates. METHODS: One hundred ninety-eight women with stage I or II and 86 women with stage IV stage breast cancer were recruited. Standardized assessment instruments and structured questions were used to collect data at study entry and 8 to 12 months later. Religious coping was measured with validated measures of positive and negative religious coping. Linear regression models were used to explore the relationships between positive and negative religious coping and overall physical and mental well-being, depression, and life satisfaction. RESULTS: The percentage of women who used positive religious coping (i.e., partnering with God or looking to God for strength, support, or guidance) "a moderate amount" or "a lot" was 76%. Negative religious coping (i.e., feeling abandoned by or anger at God) was much less prevalent; 15% of women reported feeling abandoned by or angry at God at least "a little." Positive religious coping was not associated with any measures of well-being. Negative religious coping predicted worse overall mental health, depressive symptoms, and lower life satisfaction after controlling for sociodemographics and other covariates. In addition, changes in negative religious coping from study entry to follow-up predicted changes in these well-being measures over the same time period. Cancer stage did not moderate the relationships between religious coping and well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Negative religious coping methods predict worse mental heath and life satisfaction in women with breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2008.0250

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1080/09540260124356 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.919 · DOI
  3. 10.1037//1040-3590.4.1.26 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 285

Metadata

Authors
Hebert, R., Zdaniuk, B., Schulz, R., & Scheier, M.
Affiliations
  • Forbes Hospice, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Department of Center for Social and Urban Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Hebert, Randy
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2009-06
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
537-545
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W2089503153
Cited by
285
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23mh074963-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG026010, AG026010, AG15321, R01AG015321)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 076858, HL 076852, R24HL076852, R24HL076858)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-071944, K23 MH074963, P30MH071944)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR008272, NR 09573, NR 08272, R01NR009573)
  • National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (MD 000207, P60MD000207)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
religious coping, positive religious coping, negative religious coping, breast cancer, women, well-being, mental health, depression, life satisfaction, tumor stage, spiritual distress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Pennsylvania, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review