Cited by 141Palliative and Oncologic CareCancer survivorship and carePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Utilization of Supportive and Palliative Care Services among Oncology Outpatients at One Academic Cancer Center: Determinants of Use and Barriers to Access

Open access
Kumar, Pallavi, Casarett, David, Corcoran, Amy, Desai, Krupali, Li, Qing, Chen, Jinbo, Langer, Corey, Mao, Jun J.·2012·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Abstract Background: Cancer causes significant symptom burden and diminished quality of life. Despite the expansion of supportive and palliative care services (SPCS), little is known about rates of utilization and barriers to access to these services among oncology outpatients. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey in three outpatient medical oncology clinics. Patients with a diagnosis of breast, lung, or gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and a Karnofsky score of ≥60 were included. Patients reported their use of SPCS and any perceived barriers. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with SPCS use. RESULTS: Among 313 participants, (50.5%) had not used SPCS since cancer diagnosis. The most common services used were nutrition (26.5%), psychiatric/psychological counseling (29.7%), and physical therapy (15.1%). Pain/palliative care and cancer rehabilitation consultations were used by 8.5% and 4.1% of participants, respectively. In multivariate analysis, graduate education was associated with greater SPCS use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-4.26) compared with those with high school or less, whereas having lung cancer was associated with less SPCS use (AOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.96) when compared with those having breast cancer. The biggest reported barriers to using SPCS were a lack of awareness (22.4%) and lack of physician referral (23%). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of these patients had not accessed SPCS since cancer diagnosis and cite lack of awareness and physician nonreferral as barriers. Further research is needed to understand patients' needs and beliefs regarding SPCS, and how to integrate SPCS into conventional treatments to improve cancer care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2011.0217

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, P., Casarett, D., Corcoran, A., Desai, K., Li, Q., Chen, J., Langer, C., & Mao, J. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Abramson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Mao, Jun J.
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2012-08
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
923-930
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W2004736792
Cited by
141
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT004112)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
cancer outpatients, service utilization, access barriers, physician referral, lack of awareness, educational attainment, lung cancer, breast cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, nutrition services, psychological counseling, cancer rehabilitation, symptom management
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Outpatients, Palliative Care, Pennsylvania, Quality of Life, Patient Satisfaction, Karnofsky Performance Status, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review