Factors associated with not receiving homecare, end-of-life homecare, or early homecare referral among cancer decedents: A population-based cohort study
Abstract
Publicly funded homecare has been shown to reduce acute care use and improve quality of life for those nearing end-of-life (EOL). Yet despite the known benefits of homecare, many EOL cancer patients never receive these services. We used administrative data on all cancer decedents in Ontario, Canada in 2006 to determine predictive factors of not receiving homecare, not receiving EOL homecare, and late initiation of EOL homecare. 22,262 decedents met the eligibly criteria, 25% of whom never received homecare in the last six months of life. A logistic regression found that cancer disease site, having a comorbidity (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.1-1.2), region of residence, shorter cancer survival (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.8-2.4), being male (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.2-1.3), lower income (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08), older age (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05), and less prior emergency department use were significant factors associated with not receiving homecare (p<0.001). Individuals with hematological cancer (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.3-1.8) were less likely to receive homecare in their final months. Some of these covariates also predicted not receiving EOL homecare and late referral to these services (p<0.05). The systematic differences in homecare use that we identified can help to guide strategies for improving access to these important services.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sex, rurality, and neighborhood income quintile have been previously tied to inequalities in access to care that could be exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Sex, rurality, and income quintile were chosen as strata as they have been previously tied to inequalities in access to care that could be exacerbated by the pandemic.13 , 14”
From Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on home care services among community-dwelling adults with dementia (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Brumley, R., Enguidanos, S., Jamison, P., Seitz, R., Morgenstern, N., Saito, S., McIlwane, J., Hillary, K., & Gonzalez, J. (2007) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01234.x · Cited by 845 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed publicly funded homecare at EOL has been shown to improve patient well-being, reduce acute care use, and lower overall healthcare costs [7–11].”
BackgroundDying Trajectory in the Last Year of Life: Does Cancer Trajectory Fit Other Diseases?
Teno, J. M., Weitzen, S., Fennell, M. L., & Mor, V. (2001) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/109662101753381593 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Kumar, P., Casarett, D., Corcoran, A., Desai, K., Li, Q., Chen, J., Langer, C., & Mao, J. J. (2012) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2011.0217 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on home care services among community-dwelling adults with dementia
Jones, A., Maclagan, L. C., Schumacher, C., Wang, X., Jaakkimainen, R. L., Guan, J., Swartz, R. H., & Bronskill, S. E. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2021.08.031 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bainbridge, D., Seow, H., Sussman, J., Pond, G., & Barbera, L.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bainbridge, Daryl
- Venue
- Health Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 831-839
- ISSN
- 0168-8510 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146052589
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- home care, end-of-life care, cancer, cancer decedents, hematologic cancer, comorbidities, cancer survival, emergency department utilization, socioeconomic factors, access to palliative care
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Ontario, Quality of Life, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Terminal Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review