Cited by 86Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesElectronic Health Records SystemsEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Multiple locations of advance care planning documentation in an electronic health record: are they easy to find?

Wilson, Caroline J., Newman, Jeffrey, Tapper, Sharon, Lai, Steve, Cheng, Peter H., Wu, Frances M., Tai-Seale, Ming·2013·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ambulatory care setting is a new frontier for advance care planning (ACP). While electronic health records (EHR) have been expected to make ACP documentation more retrievable, the literature is silent on the locations of ACP documentation in EHRs and how readily they can be found. OBJECTIVE: The study's objective is to identify the locations of ACP documentation in EpicCare EHR and to determine which patient and primary care provider (PCP) characteristics are associated with having a scanned ACP document. A scanned document (SD) is the only documentation containing signatures (unsigned documents are not legally valid). DESIGN: The study design is a retrospective review of EpicCare EHR records. The search of terms included advance directives, living will, Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatments (POLST), power of attorney, and do-not-resuscitate. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Subjects were patients in a multispecialty practice in California age 65 or older who had at least one ACP documentation in the EHR. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements were types and locations of documentation, and characteristics of patients and physicians. RESULTS: About 50.9% of patients age 65 or older had at least one ACP documentation in the EHR (n=60,105). About 33.5% of patients with ACP documentation (n=30,566) had an SD. Patients' age, gender, race, illnesses, and when their physician started at the medical group were statistically significantly associated with the probability of having a scanned ACP document. CONCLUSIONS: Only 33.5% of patients with ACP documentation somewhere in the EHR had an SD. Standardizing the location of these documents should become a priority to improve care. Actions are needed to eliminate disparities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2012.0472

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Goals-of-care discussions are frequently documented in unstructured text such as progress notes or other inconspicuous locations, making historical discussions difficult for clinicians to unearth during clinical care.

    “Additionally, because goals-of-care discussions are frequently documented in unstructured text such as progress notes or other inconspicuous locations, documentation of historical discussions can be difficult for clinicians to unearth during clinical care.12–14”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, C. J., Newman, J., Tapper, S., Lai, S., Cheng, P. H., Wu, F. M., & Tai-Seale, M.
Affiliations
  • Palo Alto Medical Foundation (US)
  • Sutter Health (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Mountain View, California.
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2013-09
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1089-1094
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W1967085970
Cited by
86
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
advance care planning, electronic health records, scanned documents, advance directives, POLST, do-not-resuscitate orders, living wills, power of attorney, outpatient care, older adults, primary care providers
MeSH terms
Aged, California, Documentation, Female, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Advance Care Planning, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review