Cited by 126Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Quality of Life and Cost of Care at the End of Life: The Role of Advance Directives

Open access
Garrido, Melissa M., Balboni, Tracy A., Maciejewski, Paul K., Bao, Yuhua, Prigerson, Holly G.·2015·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context Advance directives (ADs) are expected to improve patients' end-of-life outcomes, but retrospective analyses, surrogate recall of patients' preferences, and selection bias have hampered efforts to determine ADs' effects on patient outcomes.Objectives The aim was to examine associations among ADs, quality of life, and estimated costs of care in the week before death.Methods We used prospective data from interviews of 336 patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers and analyzed patient baseline interview and caregiver and provider post-mortem evaluation data from the Coping with Cancer study. Cost estimates were from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample and published Medicare payment rates and cost estimates. Outcomes were quality of life (range 0-10) and estimated costs of care received in the week before death. Because patient end-of-life care preferences influence both AD completion and care use, analyses were stratified by preferences regarding heroic end-of-life measures (everything possible to remain alive).Results Most patients did not want heroic measures (76%). Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders were associated with higher quality of life (β = 0.75, standard error = 0.30, P = 0.01) across the entire sample. There were no statistically significant relationships between DNR orders and outcomes among patients when we stratified by patient preference or between living wills/durable powers of attorney and outcomes in any of the patient groups.Conclusion The associations between DNR orders and better quality of life in the week before death indicate that documenting preferences against resuscitation in medical orders may be beneficial to many patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.09.015

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advance care planning has been associated with earlier and increased use of hospice care, reduced intensive treatment and hospitalizations at the end of life, and better quality of life in patients with cancer and caregivers.

    “Advance care planning has been associated with earlier and increased use of hospice care [12–15], reduced intensive treatment and hospitalizations at the end of life [13, 15–18], and better quality of life in patients with cancer and caregivers [12, 19].”

    From Mindfulness to enhance quality of life and support advance care planning: a pilot randomized controlled trial for adults with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results (page not available in our copy) associate DNR orders with better quality of life in the week before death among patients with advanced cancer. The paper uses caregiver reports to evaluate patient quality of life; it does not establish better quality of life for caregivers themselves. Its finding also concerns DNR orders specifically, rather than advance care planning generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Institute of Medicine Dying in America: Improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life 2014 The National Academies Press Washington, DC 25927121
  2. [37]Institute of Medicine Delivering high-quality cancer care: Charting a new course for a system in crisis [Report Brief] 2013 Available from http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2013/Delivering-High-Quality-Cancer-Care-Charting-a-New-34.Course-for-a-System-in-Crisis/Report-Brief091013.aspx. February 24, 2014 24872984

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garrido, M. M., Balboni, T. A., Maciejewski, P. K., Bao, Y., & Prigerson, H. G.
Affiliations
  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Prigerson, Holly G.
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
828-835
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007677818
Cited by
126
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH63892, K01 MH090087)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 106370)
  • Center for Research on End of Life Care (CA 156732)
  • Department of Veterans Affairs (CDA 11-201, CDP 12-255)
  • Icahn School of Medicine
  • NIA (P30 AG028741-01A2)
  • Translational Research Institute on Pain in Late Life (5P30AG022845)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders, end-of-life care, quality of life, cost of care, advanced cancer, living wills, durable power of attorney, resuscitation preferences, postmortem care, caregiver perspectives, Medicare spending
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Right to Die, Risk Factors, Terminal Care, United States, Prevalence, Advance Directives, Resuscitation Orders, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review