Cited by 103Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Promoting Resiliency among Palliative Care Clinicians: Stressors, Coping Strategies, and Training Needs

Perez, Giselle K., Haime, Vivian, Jackson, Vicki, Chittenden, Eva, Mehta, Darshan H., Park, Elyse R.·2015·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Palliative care clinicians (PCCs) are susceptible to burnout, as they regularly witness immense patient and family suffering; however, little is known about their specific challenges and training needs to enhance their long-term sustainability. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore common stressors, coping strategies, and training needs among PCCs in efforts to inform the development of a targeted Resiliency Program. METHODS: Utilizing a semistructured interview guide, we conducted a series of in-depth interviews with 15 PCCs at the Massachusetts General Hospital. RESULTS: Content analysis highlighted three main areas of stressors: (1) systematic challenges related to managing large, emotionally demanding caseloads within time constraints; (2) patient factors, such as addressing patients' mutable needs, managing family dynamics, and meeting patient and family demands and expectations; and (3) personal challenges of delineating emotional and professional boundaries. Engaging in healthy behaviors and hobbies and seeking emotional support from colleagues and friends were among the most common methods of coping with stressors. In terms of programmatic topics, PCCs desired training in mind-body skills (e.g., breathing, yoga, meditation), health education about the effects of stress, and cognitive strategies to help reduce ruminative thoughts and negative self-talk. A majority of clinicians stressed the need for brief strategies that could be readily integrated in the workplace. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that an intervention aimed to enhance PCC sustainability should focus on utilizing a skill-building approach to stress reduction that imparts strategies that can be readily utilized during work hours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2014.0221

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perez, G. K., Haime, V., Jackson, V., Chittenden, E., Mehta, D. H., & Park, E. R.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Perez, Giselle K.
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2015-04
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
332-337
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W1904042432
Cited by
103
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
12.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
palliative care clinicians, clinician burnout, resilience, occupational stressors, coping strategies, clinician training needs, emotional boundaries, family dynamics, stress reduction
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Palliative Care, Patient Care Team, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Pilot Projects, Professional-Family Relations, Professional-Patient Relations, Relaxation Therapy, Social Support, Time Factors, Needs Assessment, Qualitative Research, Resilience, Psychological, Palliative Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review