Cited by 43Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesCancer Risks and FactorsInfant Nutrition and Health

Breastfeeding Duration and the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease

Open access
Rajaei, Sheeva, Rigdon, Joseph, Crowe, Susan, Tremmel, Jennifer, Tsai, Sandra, Assimes, Themistocles L.·2019·Journal of Women's Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that prolonged breastfeeding has beneficial effects on the health of the mother including the reduction of long-term risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). The mechanism of this association remains unclear. METHODS: We surveyed 643 women aged 40-65 years receiving outpatient care at Stanford University Hospital on their reproductive/lactation history, including 137 women (cases) with clinically confirmed CAD. Survey data were supplemented with traditional risk factor data for CAD obtained from the participant's medical record. We then conducted logistic regression analyses to assess the relationship between breastfeeding duration and case-control status for each of the two separate definitions of duration. The first was based on the participant's single longest duration of breastfeeding considering all live births reported and the second was based on a participant's total duration of breastfeeding summed over all live births. For each of these two definitions, we ran three sequential models each with a different reference group-(1) nulliparous women, (2) parous women that never breastfed, and (3) parous women with a short duration of breastfeeding-successively excluding women in the reference group of the previous model(s). RESULTS: Just over one-half (51.6%) of the women surveyed reported a history of breastfeeding. We found nominally significant associations (p = 0.04-0.12) for our multivariate analyses that modeled maximum duration of breastfeeding. When compared with nulliparous women, parous women who either never breastfed or always breastfed for <5 months had approximately double the risk of CAD. Among parous women, women who breastfeed for ≥5 months at least once in their lifetime had a ∼30% decrease risk of CAD compared with those who did not initiate breastfeeding. Among parous women who breastfed ≥1 month, women who breastfed ≥5 months had ∼50% decreased risk of CAD. We found similar point estimates of effect for analogous analyses modeling maximum breastfeeding duration but p-values for these analyses were not significant. Unadjusted analyses demonstrated higher valued odds ratios and lower p-values suggesting the presence of some confounding by traditional risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Parous women who breastfeed ≥5 months in at least one pregnancy seem to be at decreased risk of CAD later in their life, whereas parous women who either never breastfed or discontinued breastfeeding early seem to be at increased risk. More research is needed to more reliably quantify and determine the nature of the relationship between parity, breastfeeding duration, and risk of CAD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jwh.2018.6970

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the case-control study, a U shaped association between length of breastfeeding and morbidity from coronary heart disease was seen, with the lowest risk in women who breastfed for 16-26 months over a total lifetime.

    “In the case-control study, a U shaped association between length of breastfeeding and morbidity from coronary heart disease was seen, with the lowest risk in women who breastfed for 16-26 months over a total lifetime.112”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]12. Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen LA. Maternal weightloss patterns during prolonged lactation. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;58:162-166.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajaei, S., Rigdon, J., Crowe, S., Tremmel, J., Tsai, S., & Assimes, T. L.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Rajaei, Sheeva
Venue
Journal of Women's Health
Published
2019-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
30-36
ISSN
  • 1059-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9996
  • 1931-843X
OpenAlex
W2904546159
Cited by
43
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL098049)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
breastfeeding duration, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk, parity, postpartum women, maternal health, breastfeeding initiation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Feeding, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Humans, Lactation, Middle Aged, Mothers, Parity, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Reproductive History

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review