Cited by 157Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adaptation of the Fluid Percussion Injury Model to the Mouse

Abstract

Fluid percussion injury (FPI) is a well-characterized experimental model of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the rat. Many pathophysiologic consequences and mechanisms of recovery after TBI rely on neurochemical pathways that can be examined in genetically altered mice. Therefore, FPI applied to mice may be a useful experimental tool to investigate TBI at the molecular level. In the present study, we establish FPI as a viable model of TBI in the mouse by characterizing acute neurological, histopathological, and behavioral changes. Right-sided parasagittal FPI or sham treatment was administered in male C57BL/6 mice. Acute neurological evaluation revealed righting reflexes in the injured animals (p < 0.001). Deficits in spatial learning and memory were observed in the Morris water maze (MWM) 5 and 6 days after injury. A novel MWM data analysis protocol is described. The injured group (n = 18) demonstrated impaired performance in the MWM during acquisition (p < 0.05) and probe trials (p < 0.025) compared to sham animals (n = 16). At 7 days postinjury, glial fibrillary acidic protein immunohistochemistry revealed intense cortical, callosal, and hippocampal gliosis. The modified Gallyas silver degeneration stain consistently labeled cell bodies and terminals throughout the ipsilateral cortex, axons in the gray matter-white matter interface above the corpus callosum and within the corpus callosum bilaterally, and terminals and fibers in the thalamus bilaterally. Additionally, the mo…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.1998.15.217

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1002/hipo.450040107 · DOI
  2. 10.1089/neu.1996.13.557 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0166-2236(96)20021-9 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s002130050327 · DOI
  5. 10.1006/hbeh.1997.1382 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/jcbfm.1994.119 · DOI
  7. 10.3171/jns.1987.67.1.0110 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1995.tb00165.x · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0031-9384(95)00009-8 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0735-7044.107.4.618 · DOI
  11. 10.1083/jcb.119.3.493 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.357 · DOI
  13. GRADY M.S., 1996, Society for Neuroscience Abs, 26, 93
  14. 10.1126/science.262.5134.762 · DOI
  15. 10.3171/jns.1985.62.6.0882 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1993.tb00531.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.67010336.x · DOI
  18. 10.3171/jns.1990.73.6.0889 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0166-2236(96)20022-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1006/exnr.1996.6366 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91229-A · DOI
  22. INTOSH T.K., 1996, Lab. Invest., 74, 315
  23. INTOSH T.K., 1990, Acta Neurochir. Suppl. (Wien), 51, 263
  24. 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90247-9 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s004010050568 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0169-328X(96)00048-4 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0163-1047(82)91253-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00370-3 · DOI
  29. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.657 · DOI
  30. 10.1101/SQB.1990.055.01.019 · DOI
  31. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-04-01337.1996 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0076-6879(83)03027-X · DOI
  33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-02-01001.1995 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/BF00241120 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0006-8993(83)91217-9 · DOI
  36. RINK A., 1995, Am. J. Pathol., 147, 1575
  37. 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02066-7 · DOI
  38. 10.1089/neu.1993.10.415 · DOI
  39. 10.3171/jns.1995.83.3.0496 · DOI
  40. 10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1126/science.262.5134.761 · DOI
  42. 10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0511 · DOI
  43. 10.1089/neu.1991.8.259 · DOI
  44. 10.1089/neu.1995.12.169 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1101/SQB.1994.059.01.029 · DOI
  46. 10.1089/neu.1992.9.281 · DOI
  47. 10.1089/neu.1992.9.21 · DOI
  48. 10.1089/neu.1992.9.335 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90266-P · DOI
  50. 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90488-6 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/BF01067075 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 157

Metadata

Authors
CARBONELL, W. S., MARIS, D. O., McCALL, T., & GRADY, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
1998-03
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
217-229
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W1978835755
Cited by
157
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50ns030305-05, 5r01ns033107-03)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-30305, NS33107)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
fluid percussion injury, traumatic brain injury, mouse model, spatial learning and memory, Morris water maze, gliosis, glial fibrillary acidic protein, corpus callosum, thalamus, righting reflex, behavioral deficits
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Injuries, Postural Balance, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Gliosis, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neuroglia, Neurons, Silver Staining, Maze Learning, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review